05-17-1982 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 17, 1982 Page 7 plicant was present. Rovegno questioned the applicant about the NSP wires and advised him that this problem should be NSP's problem and that it shouldn't be a consideration in this application. Also he noted that NSP should have an easement over his property for those wires. BRUCE HAUGLID 2245 Bayview Place Variance #684 Mabusth stated that there was no such easement. Applicant stated that the slashed area is a oroposed 12' X 24' deck. Mabusth stated that a deck is considered hardcover and that he was allowed 35% hardcover but that her calculations did not include the deck. m Callahan stated that with the included deck it would bring the total hardcover to 21% over the allowed amount. .# Rovegno noted that the length of the driveway was what was really eating up all the hardcover allowance. He noted that if they were able to move the garage closer to the street the driveway wouldn't have to be so long. Jjpplicant stated that he wanted enough room to have fB>th vehicles parallel rather than screunbling them around. Goetten stated that their main concern was with the excessive hardcover proposed. Callahan noted that the applicant wouldn't be able to put a boat and two cars into a 1 stall garage anyway. m Callahan moved to table the variance for Bruce Hauglid to give the applicant to think over his present application and try to revise and come back with a different plan. Hammerel seconded. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0). . t'V '.' • •• " A .• I,..* . : Ml-- : :I*ji Applicant was present. Mabusth noted the Engineer's recommendation that the retaining wall should continue 8' more along the steep bank. Rovegno asked if there would be any cutting down of the bank at all. CORTLEN CLOUTIER 2480 Casco Point Rd. Conditional Use Permit And Variance #674 Cloutier stated that there would be no excavation atsoever. W: I Itfriu __