My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-01-1982 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
02-01-1982 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 10:40:16 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:40:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982 Page 2 <br />% <br />It <br />I <br />Applicant asked what a legal residence was considered in <br />Orono? <br />Mabusth stated that a legal residence is defined in the <br />State Building Code, and this would be the standard that <br />Orono would use. <br />Rovegno noted that this residence was ih>t to be rental <br />residence. <br />Mrs. Wisegarver told the Planning Commission of the <br />history of the property owners. She stated that the <br />property was now owned by a trust which was her five <br />children. The court allowed this because there was <br />no child support for her children and there was no <br />other means of support. Would this mean that the five <br />children would have to live on the property? <br />Hammerel stated that the original applicant did farm <br />the property across the street but can the City deny <br />on the change in total use of subject and surrounding <br />properties. <br />Opheim asked if this is a trust or corporation with a <br />residence on it who or what individual would want to <br />live on the property. <br />Applicant stated that he would hire a manager to live <br />on the property and manage the store. <br />Rovegno asked the applicant for the proposed hours of <br />operation and the number of employees. <br />Applicant stated the hours would be from 7:00 AM to <br />9:00 PM 7 days a week. The number of employees weren't <br />decided on yet but approximately 2 full time employees <br />would be hired. <br />Mabusth stated that the Planning Commission should set <br />a limit on the signage that the business would use. <br />Rovegno stated that non conforming uses usually have <br />no standards to follow and that the City Planner should <br />address the lack of standards for non conforming uses <br />when recodification is done. <br />Callahan asked the applicant about the greenhouse useage <br />Applicant stated that the plastic structure was removed <br />and that the shed like structure was not a greenhouse. <br />They had no definite plans as of yet. <br />Kelley stated that the legal access should be Highway 6 <br />and that the access off Highway 12 should be eliminated. <br />(WISEGARVER CONT. )'
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.