Laserfiche WebLink
TRUCriCN <br />■’i J <br />[LDING <br />BAY ROM) i| <br />lAL) <br />ROAD <br />RAP <br />II <br />m ^ <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING CawISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 1977 - PAGE 6 <br />The Planning Commission reviewed Mr. Nelson’s plan requesting <br />approval to riprap his 100* of shoreline. After some dis- <br />HjKsion, Pesek moved, Qithrie seconded, to recomnend approval <br />"^W)ject to the approval of the City Engineer and applicant <br />obtaining approval of all other agencies as required. <br />Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Mr. McCleary was present. He submitted a revised site plan <br />relocating the structure to meet the necessary 50* street <br />setback. Mr. McCleary is requesting approval of a structure <br />for purposes of dry storage of boats. Facilities would also <br />provide a service function along with the sale of gas. All <br />existing buildings on the property will be removed prior to <br />construction. <br />The Planning Commission was very concerned about the proposed <br />stora|^> of an additional 108 boats inside the building. They <br />felt It would have a great effect on lake traffic and consid­ <br />eration should be given to the possible effects this could <br />have on excess boat traffic. Mr. McCleary informed the <br />CommissicMi that the maximum percentage of boats on the lake <br />at any one time was approximately 201. <br />Ihe Planning Commission noted that although the building does <br />meet the required 75* lakeshore setback, it exceeds the <br />:inum 25% hardcover in zone 2 (from 75* to 250* from shore- <br />le). The Coimiissim suggested that applicant reduce build­ <br />ing size to comply with code. Mr. McCleary was quite upset. <br />Applicant was also informed that the exposed metal surfaces <br />of the structure would require some contrasting material to <br />meet the code. <br />The Planning Commission stated that this proposed usage is <br />something that we haven’t addressed in our standards. The <br />suggestion was made that a public hearing be held to deter­ <br />mine the reaction of the surrounding neighbors. <br />After some discission, McDonald moved, Hassel seconded, to <br />schedule a public hearing and to notify all property oilers <br />within 300 feet of the subject property and as many as <br />possible along the shoreline of Stubbs Bay. <br />Motion; Ayes - 3 Olannah, McDonald, Hassel), Nays - 1 (Pesek). <br />Abstain - 1 (Guthrie). <br />ROBERT NELSON <br />4108 HIOiWOOD ROAD <br />RIPRAP <br />(#233) <br />STUBBS BAY MARINA <br />3445 BAYSIffi ROAD <br />OaNSTRUCTION PROPOSAL <br />SITE AND EI^ATICN PLANS <br />(#234) <br />i?.- -v * <br />i <br />The Planning Commission went into a work session on North <br />Shore Marina.NORTH SHORE MARINA <br />3222 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />1977 LICENSE APPLICATION <br />REVIEW <br />(#235) <br />1