Laserfiche WebLink
;H <br />u <br />S- ':. â– ' <br />tM <br />.* <br />^Nirres OF A PLANNING CX^iUSSIOI MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 1977 - PAGE 4 I i <br />Mr. Bonner reminded the Planning Canmission that they <br />recomnended approval of Phase II subject to a safety <br />|rf||port. A qualified engineer has made his investiga* <br />^Hon and a report will be prepared by the time of the <br />Council meeting of February 28, 1977. <br />The Planning Conmission conveyed to Mr. Bonner their <br />unhappiness with the progress and past problems result­ <br />ing from the lack of the applicant complying with code <br />and licensing procedures. <br />Mr. Bonner felt that there has been a substantial break­ <br />down between the Council and his client. This is some­ <br />thing that can happen, and that they have nothing to <br />hide. <br />The Planning Comnission felt they should not consider <br />increasing the size of Ski Tonka at this time until <br />we can find out if present operation can exist. Any <br />increase in a Conditional Use Permit increases the <br />operation. Ski Tonka has not been able to prove <br />that the present facility can operate within the law. <br />A leng^y discussion followed. The Planning Comnissian <br />determined that the conditional use permit application <br />filed by Ski Tonka had expired. They also felt the <br />application w^ void as the owners had not lived iq> <br />the conditions set forth on the ccxiceptual approval <br />mer never submitted safety inspector’s report). <br />Pesdc moved, Guthrie seconded, to reconmend that a <br />new application for a Conditional Use Permit be sub­ <br />mitted on the basis that the old one was never taken <br />advantage of. Conditions of conceptual approval were <br />never met. Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />^[iplicant was ^ instructed to submit another current <br />application with the necessary plans and reports. <br />Another fee would be required with the new application. <br />The Zoning Administrator informed the Comnission that <br />original request was for vacation of platted alley idiich <br />lies between his three lots and to conbine Lots 11, 12 <br />and 13 along with the vacated alley to create a parcel <br />lai^e enoq^ to meet our minimum zoning requirements of <br />1/2 acre. ^>plleant is now requesting to change applica­ <br />tion for a variance only to use Lot 12 and 13 as a build­ <br />ing site. <br />The Planning Comnission felt that a cemservation easement <br />on Lot 11 should be granted to the City. Mr. Bill Ecoff, <br />i^resenting Williamson Construction, was present. He <br />he would be willing to grant this easement to <br />SKI TONKA <br />(continued) <br />'1 <br />I tj' <br />ji <br />WILLIAMSON CCNSTRUCTICN CO. <br />3779 CASCO AVENUE <br />VACATION OF UNUSED ALLEY <br />(M VARIANCE ON LOTS 12 <br />AND 13 IF VACATION IS DENIED <br />(#226) <br />I