Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />tNMon <br />B <br />INAKIO <br />.mf L-. <br />MINUTBS OF A PLACING CXM4ISSIQN FCETING HELD OCTOBER 18, 1976 - PAGE 5 <br />_ja <br />The Asst. Zoning Administrator stated that Mr. Becker had <br />sidmiitted a revised plan. He had purchased additional land <br />allowing all five lots to meet the necessary recmiiements. <br />Each lot contains at least 2 acres of dry buildable land <br />(87,120 sq. ft.). Hannah moved. Hake seconded, to approve <br />as submitted subject to a Park Dedication Fee and easements <br />be granted for the roadway which is noted as 50 * wide with <br />a 50* radius cul-de-sac, with the easement marrowing to 30* <br />along the north side of Lot 5. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />The Asst. Zoning Administrator eiqplained that no ad^tional <br />material had been submitted; however, Mr. Jim DeSplinter <br />had just approadied him and stated he had just signed a <br />purchase agreement for this property. Mr. DeSplinter <br />requested that the Planning Conmission give him a futme <br />time limit to submit necessary information. The Commission <br />informed the new applicant that he should provide information <br />on the proposed driveway and what he intended to build, and <br />to also provide a survey. Hdce moved, Guthrie seconded, to <br />table this matter to allow the applicant to submit the necessary <br />data as requested at the Septafoer 9, 1976, meeting. Motion - <br />Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />KLAUS BECKER <br />511 N. FERNDAI£ <br />SUBDIVISION (prel; <br />REVISED (#156) <br />ijii mf <br />R0BERT JOHNSON <br />1121 EIMIKXX) AVENUE <br />VARIANGB - LOT MEA 6 WIDIH <br />(#164) <br />I USAGE <br />B BLVD. <br />. .-U' J <br />ID OFFER <br />Mr. Ryan and his Attorney Doug Carney were present. Th^ <br />^resubmitted the original subdivision propos^ after having <br />• II Mktiie Planning O <br />Mr. Ifyan had studied the area again and feels that the only <br />acceptable way to subdivide is with two lake^ore lots. <br />Any other way would interfere with his driveway and garage* <br />Some meabers felt that the lot lines could be arranged to <br />meet the lot width requirement at the building line. After <br />a brief discussion, Pesek moved. Hake seconded, to accept <br />this subdivision proposal based on the follcwing: <br />(1) It is consistent with land - lot on either side is <br />of same width. <br />(2) County approval of any new access road to the south <br />parcel. <br />(3) IWo Park Dedication Fees be paid. <br />(4) Ponding area is retained as is. <br />Motion; Ayes - 4 (Pesek, Hake, Guthrie, Hannah), Nays - 2 <br />(Dunlap, Van Nest), Abstain - 1 OfcDonald). <br />Chairwoman Dunlap stated as minority opinion that she is <br />opposed because this is a new subdivision and cannot vote <br />for any new subdivisions requiring variances. <br />Mr. Olson informed the Conmission that the applicant had <br />Oo new information at this time. Necessary information <br />^^ould be submitted at the next meetii^. Hannah moved, <br />Guthrie seconded, to table this application \mtil the <br />Novenber 1, 1976, meeting. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />•7:11 <br />TOM ROAN <br />1060 TONKMIK F <br />SUBDIVISICN (FRELl <br />(#170) <br />i:uc MOO <br />V. ^ <br />mmm <br />G. RAYMOND 8 RUIH WOLPE <br />2925 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCE - SIDE YARD