Laserfiche WebLink
MOWIES (f A FIMONG OOMSSION WBnNB HSLO JUtt «, 1078 - 2 <br />2_^fs <br />builder» vli^ imil of a Jiow dwelling' iHateid of <br />«n laiattandad lot* oo^wHion of fhe proposed lot widths <br />to existing lots in Se^ Hill (he presented a chart <br />shoring all Forest Lake lot frontages), and payomt of <br />two sewer assessnents. <br />The Planning Goandsaion discussed precedence in approval <br />of a new st£division where both parcels would be below <br />80t of the required lot width and just above 80t of the <br />required lot area. Also noted was that the Ode Street <br />vacation was naant to cut dom on lot splits and sub- <br />stndaid lot useage, not to encouragf? 4ds . <br />« - f-.- <br />Goiaicilnan Welsh also discussed this precedence and the <br />intent of Goieprehensive Guide Plan in linitina the <br />: lakeshoredensity of lakeshore developnent. He stated ^t <br />has established preoedanoe for variances on existing <br />sti>standard lots, but would be carefbl of the establish <br />leent of new sid>standard lots. He added that there is <br />gecedam for refind^ sewer assMSMts when t^ were <br />to be incorrectly ^iplied. The Rblic Hearing <br />j^c\csQd at 8:11 p.n. <br />1 <br />After continued discussion, Guthrie noved, Pesek seconded, <br />reconaendation of approval of this sii>division because the <br />lot area neets 801 of the requiraamt and because the pro­ <br />posed lot width is sinilar to existing lots in the area. <br />Hake argued that the only hardship he could see was <br />econonic and not of the land; that the owner could correct <br />the existing erosion probleai and could naintain the property <br />without a subdivision. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (2) (Im, <br />Dunlap). <br />aiairwoMm Dinlap called to order the Regular Meeting of the GALL TO ORCBR - 8:15 P.M. <br />Qrono Planning CoMdssion. BSGlSiAR ICBTIN6 <br />Hake noved, Guthrie seconded, to recoawnd approval of tl <br />riprap application subject to using approved 12 inch or <br />larger stone naterial and sihject to the approval of all <br />other agencies. Motion, Ayes (S) - Nays (0) <br />SIEVE RQtiiW 3024 CASCO POINT 1 <br />JOB BRAUN <br />3020 CASCO POINT <br />RIPRAP mMITS <br />Discussion developed concerning the substandard size of <br />this parcel coa|>ared to mailer adjacent properties as <br />well as the aenerally laidevsloped surroukUng land. <br />m <br />Hake noved, Pesek seconded, to table the natter idiile <br />the applicant nakes an effort to acqu^A« sone of the <br />adjacent mdaveloped property. Motion, Ayes (4) • <br />Nays (1) (McDonald). <br />J