Laserfiche WebLink
m <br />BANNING OOfflSSIGN MEETING HEID MMf 17» 1976 • Page 2 <br />|[|cin Lindsay of Kelly Avenue Holding Caif)any presented his <br />proposal fbr a sidxlivision for Rezoning and Conditional <br />Use Pennit applications for a PRO and duplex credit on <br />parcel for structures within 200* of comiercially zon^ <br />district. A copy of the deed conveying the subject <br />property, revised plans and aerial photos of the area <br />were presented. Ine Gondssion discussed resolving of <br />maintenance responsibility and lack of adequate detail for <br />obtaining conclusive approval of the PRD proposal. <br />Van Nest moved, Hannah seconded racoanending conceptual <br />approval for 3 single family uiits on the PRD parcel (1} <br />Since this particular parcel is presently ocoq;>ied by ^ <br />living units consisting of the existing duplex, only one <br />additional single family mit could be addM until sudi <br />time that the existing duplexes were removed from the <br />property. Motion, Ayes (S) • Nays (0). <br />The Goandssion continued with a discussion on the duplex <br />credit proposal. The question was raised as to the conflict <br />between the ordinance provisions for duplex credit and H <br />lakeshore setback for multiple construction. <br />Ill <br />Pesek moved, Guthrie seconded to recommend approv.il of <br />duplex credit in lieu of the single fmiiily units or the <br />proposal. Mr. Pesdc expressed the presence of deliv- <br />^^^^ery ti^j^ks, garbagage trucks, garbage dunpsters, damaged <br />autos for repur, etc. would create a nuisance and result <br />in a dmir.uition of value of the residentially zoned <br />district. He also stated tiiat the duplexes would pro­ <br />vide an appropriate buffer zone from the existing single <br />family residences to the south and therefore justify a <br />ruplex credit. The recommendation for approval was <br />made with the following conditions: <br />1) Maximum boat docUng - 2 boats per living mit <br />or 4 boats per duplex. <br />All 3 duplex units to be located within 200 feet <br />of the oonmercially zoned district. <br />The 3rd duplex unit would not be erected until the <br />existing diplex on the property was removed. <br />Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (1) Van Nest - Abstain (1) <br />McDonald <br />2) <br />3) <br />Van Nest moved, Guthrie seconded recommending approval of <br />rezoning of the 20* strip along north end of the property <br />from B-3 to LR-IB. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). <br />After reviewing Mr. Sweetser*s revised subdivision pro> <br />posal which included individual parcels for the existing <br />two dwelling units, Guthrie moved, Hannah seconded rerom- <br />^^jnandation fbr approval of the preliminary plans of the <br />V,_jubdivision proposal. Motion, Ayes (S) - Nays (0). <br />Mr. Roessel presented his proposal for a Conditional Use <br />Permit to keep horses in a residential zone and Variances <br />from the code requirements of principal structure fbr <br />KELLY AVENUE HOAING 00. <br />2SOO KELLY AVENUE <br />SUBDIVISION AND BEZONING <br />sJ^^O^O^LAKE ROAD <br />PBELIMINARy SUBDIVISICN <br />ROBERT ROESSEL <br />65 CYCNET FLA(X <br />mONAL USB I <br />VARIANCE <br />•• jii :t 6 <br />ii>airr<-niiuwT»