04-05-1976 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MMnES OF A PLMMING OOM4ISSION MSTING HEU) APUtL 5, 197» • PAQB 3. U. - Chaiinan Pesek aimoutod that it was tins fbr the V\Jblic FUBUC HEARING - 8:15 P.M. Hearing on the subdivision iq^lilication of fCemeth W« Oien XENNBIH W. OIEN Afor his ptbperty at 2980 CasM Point Road and the Zoning Adsdn- 2980 CASCO POINT ROAD istrator presented the Notice of Public Hearing and Affadavit SUBDIVISIGN of publication. Mr. Oien explained that he would like to di vide his 51,000 sq. ft« tract into tMo lots both exceeding 1/2 acre and the 100 ft. 16t width requiitnent. The Zoning Aoidn- ttion to a Ban he had drafted after recei^istrator called attention to a mp he had drafted after receiving survey infoination j^roM the neighMring property owner, Hanilton Moran. It ^lowAd that the present existing CasM Point Road, i^ch did not fbllcM the line of the platted road, and ri^t- of-way would run throuab the Oien property, thus reducing the available area necessarty to meet the Zoning Code. The Zoning Administrator stated that State statutes provide for the ri^t of wnicipalities to atpiire 33 ft of property on both sides of any rood used and naintained for nore than six years. Mr. Oien isting house ri^t in the Idddle of the road, public were heard, the hearing was closed. :er all the The Chairman Hake seconded, the ir meeting. Van Nest moved.e regula: ...... the subnvision application of Kenneth N. Oien be tabled until the next meeting in order that a sur vey showing the existing roadway and right *of-wiQr in relation the Oien property be presented and to include an accurate putation of the dxy buildable area excluding the roadway and right-of-wi^. MoiUon, fyes (6) - Nays (0). The Gomiiission reviewed the application of Ronald Ross to place an accessory building on a thni lot located at 1960 Lakeview Terrace. As the Gomaission began to recoanend ap proval with a condition requiring Mr. Ross to conbine his adjoining lot objected and requested that his adjoining property not be consideration in the petition. The GGanission Tx>inted out a _^_ _ _ _^ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ located in a two acre zone and his existing hoamsite consisted on one acre. Coabina- tion with the adjoining lot would bring his property up to present zoning requirements. The Zoning Adninistrator ad vised Mr. Ross that a Building Permit could not be issued for the vacant lot because it consisted of about 751 wet lands. He also advised the Planning Goaadssion that a coabination now would prevent problems that mi^t result from any new owner purchasing the property with intentions to build on a parcel consisting mostly of wetlands. He felt that as long as the two parcels are not coabined, the City would have no control over the sale of each ijidividual parcel. Although Mr. Ross persisted in objecting to this ' tion. Van Nest pointed out that it was well within loamdssion jurisdiction to make recoamendation having stipulated conditions. Van Nest mcpved. Hake seconded, that the Planning Gaaadssion recoamend to the Council approval of the Conditional Use Pendt application of Ronald Ross sibject to the coabination of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Long Lake Country Club Addition. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). /'"Ncondi V^the C a*i > ^ •riHW. OIEN 2980 CASOO FOOrr EQAD SUBSmSION •Vj 'Nm 'Ti i KMALD JOSS 1960 LAXEVIEN 1ERIUCB OGNOmoUL USB FEUOT I r