Laserfiche WebLink
LETTER, <br />planning COWISSION meeting held FEBFUAIV 17, 1976,. Page 5. <br />The history v^iich leads up to now is as follows. <br />May 30, 1974. Lot purchased from DiCon. <br />Con®wnicated with Dexter Marson, City <br />Planner, abo^ my propos^ to remove part of the bank. He wasn’t <br />SffGCtIGcl HIV hty^haco I K h^ tgirfirE|KS£<“i r <br />L junsdicticm over my proposal. It took Mr. Marson <br />^i. e to be convinced, ^t after several weeks he agreed with <br />was about this time that Mr. Marson left the City of <br />Was told to deal with Mike Scheller, Orcno <br />wi^g Inspector. He also was not sure idiich ordinances con- <br />and told me to talk to Mr. Malkerson, one <br />o^e City’s attorneys. Mr. Scheller has also left the City of <br />Talked to Mr. Malkerson about my application <br />^ine said to mail him the survey so that he could Sderstand <br />what I was asking for. The survey was mailed that day. <br />/*■% August <br />Wsaia tlw™ «ppx4.»-«»uxwi xejLi under ordinance #167-31.700. He <br />a new proposed code being prepared and that It would be effective in 6 to 8 months. <br />fiissi^^ Proposal I. rejected by the Planning Com- <br />September 25y 1974. Sent letter to Mr. Malkerson asking for <br />•All ot thb lules idiich govern this 75’ area”. <br />^ Malkerson. Label-ra^sT^iBTt^ A was an ordinance dated June 28, 1974, 31,700 <br />md 31.705. 31.710 was not included. 31.710 said, among other <br />things, the requirement of Section 31.700 are not intended to <br />customary grading in the area of....newly <br />COTst^ted building.....-—any unusual earth filling or removi <br />of gr^g shai be referred by the Building Inspector to the <br />Plamirg Commission...” I believe since thi gradLig was shoL <br />on the building^imit and was also evident from the design of <br />the house that this section of the ordinance would have eSnpted <br />TO from having to apply for a variance. It was the Building <br />"unusual” work to^ePlanning Cornnissicn. Apparently, he did not think that the work <br />was unusu^ since he did not refer it to them. The newly pro­ <br />posed ordinance was also enclosed as Exhibit ”B”. <br />^tober 16, 1974. Proposal II. <br />Cormission and rej ected.submitted to the Planning <br />to Mr. Malierson‘e:^aSSrS^ r^^'^iAy'^rpr^sals^shSSd <br />SAUBL MARFIELD LETIER, <br />cent.