Laserfiche WebLink
Il was alsi> suggested that the ctnle uinendmeni include an inlniduetor) punigniph of intent in terms <br />of maintaining neighKtrhiHHl chunicterislies. <br />It was also suggested that language be added gi\ ing the C'iu ability to turthcr regulate or e\ en i'urcc <br />the closua* oi'any home (tccupation tliat is found to be having negativ e impacts i>n tlic ncigliborhood. <br />A ‘humc ttccupalions ’ code amcndMcal should be drafted and bru jehl back lo fianninie <br />Commission in a final form for review and recommendation. (The public hcarini; tabled on <br />November 19 should he re-opened). <br />Boalh«»uses and l.akeshoreStructures <br />Consensus was to do an inventory of what's out there, perhaps a pnijeet that could be dtme by a <br />student or intern. Most were generally ()K w ith making certain types ol structures legal, but the key <br />to making this work is to have clear criteria h>r what should and shtnildn't be saved. Minnesota <br />I listorical Society or SI IIM) should have existing guidelines for detennining whether a structure has <br />historical importance or value. We alst» iKvd to maintain tlw principiil «»l a natural Kntking lakeshoa*. <br />and eiinsider the hardcover aspects. <br />(Kcrbaocs. Bay W iodows. Ktc. <br />My notes don't iiave much on this... only tliut the lost 2'uruver)iang shouldn't be considered as lot <br />coverage. Please help me out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <br />When Docs a Rem«Mlcl liccomc a Total Rebuild? <br />Consensus was to adopt a fonnal p^>lic> similar in sci»pe to tliat proposed in the stall'memo, but in <br />item 4. change the threshold peaentagts. A renuHlel should be considered as a total a ’build when <br />ihc uflumc of ih'Mly amstnu'h'tl or recioiMnuWif yfurcc.: cwciuh (not of the fUuit total <br />hiiiltfluii volume: i.e. if just over half of the final prvHiuct will be new. tlvn it’s a total rebuild, and <br />the entire set t»f standards (lot aura, width, setbacks. h>t .-overage, hardcover) nmst be met. <br />Also, a "newly constructed space" will be one in which 75"n (not 5()"o) of the surface area of <br />walls/ceiling'lloor are new construction: i.e. the consensus was that a riHim must have 3 4 of its <br />surfaces new to be considered as •newly constriKted'. I he question was raised as to vv lut coastitutes <br />new con.struetion in terms of a wall t»r llimr... diKs new .shcx'tnK'k i»ver an exi.sting stud wall <br />constitute new coastruction? (Maybe) 1 low about iwvv studs and sheetnKk in tire some location os <br />a pre-existing wall? (lliat's new) 1 low ubt)ut new llooring over on existing floor platfonn? ( ITiat's <br />not new) Let's discuss other possibilities that will be thrown at us... <br />A policy residutitm t»r perhaps ev en a axle amerdment should be adopted once the final langaige <br />is worked out. <br />1