Laserfiche WebLink
p <br />Housing Plan <br />August 23,2001 <br />Page 3 <br />Scenarios E*H: 4 Units/Ac. Average Density (200 total units on 49 acres) <br />(Note that the Comprehensive Se^er Plan allots up to 200 sewer units for this parcel group) <br />E 49 ac. at 4 units/ac. <br />F Sac. at 10 units/ac. <br />5 ac. at 6 unils/ac. <br />39 ac. at 3 units/ac. <br />G 10 ac. at 6 unilsac. <br />20 ac. at 4 units'ac. <br />19 ac. at 3 units/ac. <br />II 6ac. at 10 units/ac. <br />20 ac. at 6 units/ac. <br />23 ac. at 1 unit/ac. <br />= 196 mid-range lowiihomcs <br />OR <br />» 50 unit apt. bldg, on 5 acre site <br />« 30 afTordable lownhomcs on 6 acres <br />* 117 single family homes on 1/4 acre lots (t>p. 100*.xl20') <br />OR <br />= 60 afTordable lovvnhomes on 10-acrc site <br />^ 80 mid-range townhomes on 20-acre site <br />® 57 high-end townhomes on 19-acre site <br />OR <br />“ 60 unit apartment bldg on 6-acre site <br />» 120 affordable towiihomes on 20 acres <br />« 23 single family homes on I acre lots <br />Scenarios A, F & H would provide the rental housing needed to meet the Rental Housing goal. <br />Scenarios A, F. G H would go a long way towurd meeting the Owner-occupied Affordable <br />Housing goal, <br />b. The 40-plus acre area north of Kelley Parkway has about 27 acres of dry buildable land. The <br />interspersed wetlands provide natural separation and buffering; this could result in many small <br />scattered groupings of touiihomes as opposed to one or two larger many-unit buildings, although <br />providing high density in a few larger buildings might allow for better preservation of some natural <br />wooded/wctland areas. At a density of 3 units per acre. 75-80 comfortably scattered townhome in <br />groups of 2,3 and 4 attached units ore feasible. At a density of 6 units per acre, 150-160 units would <br />certainly be feasible; the trade-off is that a portion would have to be in buildings containing more <br />than 4 attached units. Various scenarios similar to those noted for the Dumas/James properties could <br />be devised to assist in meeting affordability goals. <br />Council Direction Requested <br />Council is asked to consider whether densities of 6-10 units per acre would be acceptable for <br />portions of the Highway 12 areas identified for higher densities in the CMP. An average density of <br />4 units per acre on the Dumas/James property, could allow for a mi.x of 6-10 units^acre housing t>pes <br />and I-2 units/acrc housing types. Similarly, on the Kellev Parkway site, an average density of 6 units <br />per acre would allow for a variety of townhomes as well as a limited number affordable rental units.