Laserfiche WebLink
<^01*2718 Zoning Code Amendment <br />October 1 1.2001 <br />Page 2 of 3____________________ <br />C Fences uhich do not exceed i-!/2feet in height, fences not over 6 feet in height <br />along the street lot line of lake frontage lots which front on a major thoroughfare, iff.ll is required, the total <br />combined height of both fence and fill shall not exceed 6 feet above the height of the crown of the road. <br />terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures, which do not extend above the height of the <br />ground Hoor level of the principal building and extend to a disunce of not less than 2 feet from any lot line. <br />D. In side or rear yards only, bays not to exceed a depth of 2 feet nor to contain ai. <br />area of more than 20 souare feet, fire escapes not to exceed a width of 3 feet, fences and walls not to exceed <br />a height of 6feet above original grade and open off- street parking exceptfor lakeshore lots, nofence or wall <br />over 42 inches but not in excess of ■ 2 inches in height above original grade may be located closer to the <br />shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots such <br />fences shall not be constructed h ithin 7S feet of the shoreline <br />yard only, balconies, breezeways, detached outdoor picnic shelters and <br />recreational equipment except as regulated hereinafter; no accessory structure shall be closer than 5 feet from <br />a rear lot line nor shall a fence or wall constructed within a rear yard exceed a height of 6feet above original <br />grade. <br />F. Side yards only; no accessory structure shall be closer than 10 feet from any side <br />ofrnce or wall constructed within a side yard e.xceed a heigh of 6 feet above original <br />Proposed Ordinance Language: <br />Exhibit A is a draft ordinance that was reviewed by the Planning Commission. The primary intent of the <br />ordinance revision is to require “finished" sides of fences to face the neighbors house. Most Cities require <br />the finished side of the fence to be faced cither towards the neighbor and/or towards the public right of way. <br />The proposed ordinance docs not change the existing requirements for height and location of a fence, e.xcept <br />in the case of a split rail fence. The proposed ordinance would allow fences of no more than three rails to <br />have a maximum height of 48" and rail fences may be 60" above grade when used for the keeping of horses <br />In all cases a split rail fence could not be more than 50% opaque. The only other proposed revision would <br />change the average lakeshore setback" for fences to be defined as the average setback between the fence <br />owners residence and the closest adjacent neighbors residence rather than the average setback between <br />the two adjacent residences. <br />Review of Planning Commission Discussion - Proposed Ordinance Changes <br />The proposed ordinance for revievv and discussion would allow split rail fences to exceed the <br />existing standards of 3 Vi feet in required front or street yards. The proposed ordinance would allow <br />fences of no more than three rails to have a maximum height of 48" and rail fences may be 60" above <br />grade when used for the keeping of horses. In all cases a split rail fence could not be more than 50% <br />opaque. <br />The new ordinance would Include language that would require fence owners to keep a fence in a <br />reasonable and safe condition. <br />1