My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
11-26-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:26:29 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:23:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NOV 2 6 200\ <br />CO t wr uooimO <br />. .rc-own request for council action <br />DATE: November 21.2001 <br />ITEM NO.: (f <br />DcpaiimcDt Approval: <br />Name Paul Weinberger <br />Tilk Zoning Administrator <br />Admiaislrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: <br />ListofEibibits <br />tiO 1 -2718 Zoning Code Amendment <br />Section 10.03. Subdivision 15 Relating to Fence Standards <br />A Ordinance <br />B Sample Illustrations <br />C Staff Reports <br />Background <br />Council had requested an opportunity to review the City Ordinances os they relate to fence construction and <br />design. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 17. 2001 and a Work Session on <br />October 4.2001 to discuss amendments to the existing ordinance The Planning Commission concluded the <br />ordinance should reflect amendments that would include standards on fence construction, maintenance and <br />changing the permitted height of “split rail" fences. Council rev iewed the proposed ordinance on November <br />12. 2001 and directed stall to draO an ordinance that would establish fence maintenance standards. The <br />existing ordinance dinrs not regulate fencing materials or visual appearance of fences. One primary issue <br />noted by Council is whether the City should require property owners constructing fences to locate the <br />‘Tinished" side of a fence towards neighboring properties. The finished side ofa fence assumes the structural <br />supports face the fence owners property. <br />Fences have been regulated under the section of ordinance tilled "non-Encroachmenis" (Section 10.03. <br />Subdivision IS). Non-Encroachments are items, such as fences, that are allowed to be located within <br />required front, side and rear yard setbacks. Council has indicated that the current ordinance may need <br />revision to fence regulations pertaining to fence construction and to review whether a permit should be <br />required for fence construction. <br />Council hod directed the Planning Commission review fence standards as they relate to height, permits, and <br />other issues. The Planning Commission will be revisiting this issue early in 2002. <br />StafiyPkHMny Comroissioa Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission recommended approv al of the new fence standards. The primary intent of the <br />ordinance rev ision is to require “finished" sides of fences to face the neighbors house. Most Cities require <br />tlie finished side of the fence to be faced cither towards the neighbor and/or towards the public right of way. <br />The proposed ordinance does not change the existing requirements for height and location of a fence, except <br />in the case of a split rail fence. The proposed ordinance would allow fences of no more than three rails to <br />have a maximum height of 48" and rail fences may be 60" above grade w hen used for the keeping of horses.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.