My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
11-13-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:26:21 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:23:29 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Moaday* October 22,2001 <br />7:00 o'clock p.in. <br />(019 - Ameadmeof to Aoinal Rcfulations, Cootlaocd) <br />Sanscvcrc pointed out the ofdinance berore the Council tonight is not specifically geared towards <br />John Hollander. Sansevere staled the ordinance applies to all the residents of Orono. <br />Flint commented if there are errors in the document, those can be corrected after-the-fact. Flint stated <br />Hollander is welcome to submit his suggestions concerning this ordinance. <br />Hollander reiterated he did request that a copy of the ordinance be sent to him prior to tonight’s <br />meeting, which was not done. Hollander stated he does have a rigtil to review the document prior to ihu <br />meeting since it docs affect him. <br />Flint stated the Council is going to vote on the motion now. <br />Hollander reiterated he is opposed to the amendment since in his view it is directed at him personally. <br />Sansevere inquired whether people who currently have five or more cats on their property would be <br />grand-fathered in under this ordinance. <br />Tom Barrett staled there is no grand-fathering in under this ordinance. <br />Sansevere stated Hollander would need to come to the City and request a kennel license if he w ishes to <br />keep five or mure cats on his property. <br />Hollander stated he is in disagreement witli that and that this ordinance cannot be made retroactive. <br />VOTE ON THE ABOVE MOTION: Ay« 4, Nb >t 0. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br />Flint stated the City does need to infonn the residenu of the area that the City of Orono’s position has <br />been mischaracterized by the Ma>or of Minnetonka Beach regarding the closure of local streets in <br />Minnetonka Beach serving Orono residents. Flint staled the Mayor of Minnetonka Beach has told <br />people that the Orono City Council and the Chief of Police do not object to closing off certain roadways <br />in Minnetonka Beach, which is in error. Flint noted the City has attempted to meet with the Mayor of <br />Minnetonka Beach on several occasions to discuss the trail issue and was turned down. <br />Flint recommended a letter be sent to the Mayor along with each individual Council member of <br />Minnetonka Beach. <br />Moorse stated Staff and other representatives were ready to meet with the Ma>or of Minnetonka Beach, <br />who declined their invitation. Moorse noted the Police Chief did send the Ma>t)r of Minnetonka Br sch <br />a letter clarify ing her position on the closure of the roadways. <br />PAGE 26 <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.