Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 22,2001 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />7:00 P.M. <br />(#4) FOREST LAKE LANDING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY <br />Flint noted this item has not been noticed as a public hearing, with the Council merely acting on the <br />recommendation of the Park Commission regaling classiHcalion of this lake occess point. <br />Moorse staled the Park Commission has recommended that the Forest Lake Landing be classified as a <br />Class I. which includes activities such as pedestrian access to the lake, fishing from shore, and <br />launching canoes and other small boats not requiring a trailer. The Class I category does not include the <br />swimming beach use. The Park Commission has recommended against classifying the right-of-way as a <br />passive natural area. <br />Moorse stated the City Council may w ish to address the question of whether a trail should be installed in <br />the right-of-way and whether a set of stairs should be installed to provide access down the hill to the <br />lokcshore. <br />Sansevere inquired what Planning Director Gaffron's recommendation is concerning this access point <br />Gaffron indicated his knowledge of this access point goes back approximately 20 years, with his <br />understanding being that this access point has not been frequently used in the past with the City never <br />taking any steps to do any improvements to the area. Gaffron stated in his view very limited use of this <br />access point is reasonable, w ith pedestrian access to the lake also being reasonable. Gaffron stated in <br />his opinion installation of a dock or swimming is not reasonable for this location, and that perhaps some <br />fishing could be done from the lakcshore. <br />Gaffron slated there is an issue w ith parking in the neighborhood. Gaffron stated in his view these lake <br />access points ore intended to serve the neighborhoods in which they are located. <br />Sansevere commented in his view this access point should be passive. Sansevere stated in his opinion <br />fishing or sw imming is not appropriate at this site. <br />White staled the encroachments from the Mullin property do pose a problem with this access point, with <br />the Council or Park Commission not suggesting at this time that those items be removed out of the ri^t- <br />of-way. While stated all of the lake access points arc public property, and in his view this access point <br />will not become heav ily used. W hite commented in his view the uses suggested for this site appear to <br />be reasonable and that the City con address any problems that may possibly arise in the future at the <br />time there is an issue. <br />Nygard commented in his view there has been a struggle over the past year over whether anyone should <br />be entitled to use this lake access point. N>gard stated this is public land, and that the recommended <br />passive use for this lake access point is appropriate for this location. Nygard stated he is supportive of <br />making this site accessible and to make it safer for people to get to and from the shoreline. Nygard <br />stated the City has an obligation to protect these lake access points, which are a priceless heritage, for <br />future generations. Nygard stated he is in favor of the Park Commission's recommendation. <br />PAGE 3