My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
11-13-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:26:21 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:23:29 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Moadaj, October 22.2001 <br />7:00 o'clock p.n. <br />PuMk stated as far as the design of the house is concerned. Item No. 3 in Staffs Report indicates <br />that any changes to the approved plan would require a new variance application. Puzak requested that <br />Item 3 be clarified to read as follows: “any major amendment to the site sketch which would increase <br />hardcover or increase lakeshore setback shall require a new variance application". <br />Weinberger stated the language included in the motion subject to Staff review and appro\'al would <br />give Staff the opportunity to do that. Weinberger stated If Staff feels the revised house plan is beyond <br />Council’s approval, they would bring that application back before the Council. <br />Flint suggested the Applicant work with Staff on drafting a resolution for Council approval. <br />Puzak inquired what would happen if an easement is not obtained from Franklin. <br />Sansevere stated he would then need to come back to the Council with his house design and a workable <br />septic system design. <br />Nygard stated this application would not be finally approved until the next Council meeting, so if there <br />are changes that have occurred, the Applicant can address them at the next meeting. <br />Flint stated the application was not in a form that could be finalized and approved tonight, <br />Franklin inquired what steps he would need to follow in order to grant an easement. <br />Weinberger stated they would need to determine the appropriate location where the sewer line would <br />enter the property and a legal description, along with Franklin ’s signature providing an easement to the <br />public. <br />Gaffron stated Staff does have standard language for an easement, but someone will need to develop an <br />easement description, which is the most time-consuming and difficult part of granting an easement <br />Puzak inquired how long that process would take. <br />Gaffron stated that really is not up to the City to determine. <br />PAGE 32
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.