Laserfiche WebLink
RKQIIKST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />COj/W^n McpTlNQ <br />2 2 2001 <br />cityoFoaoMo <br />Date: October 1 9. 2001 <br />Item No.: ^ <br />l>rparlmcnt Apprmal: <br />Name: Michael P. Gallron <br />Title: Planning Direclor AAdministrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />/ofiing <br />Item Description: #2640/2641 Dunbar Development Corp.. 2060 Wu>‘2ala Ulvd. <br />• Final Council Approval <br />List or Exhibits <br />A • Res4»Iution 4619 (Concept Plan Approval adopted March 12.2001) <br />B - (For adoption) Preliminarv' Plat Approval Resolution <br />C - (For adoption) General Development Plan & Final Plat Approval Resolution <br />D - (For approval) PUD 2A (Office) Developers Agreement <br />F - (For approval) PUD 2B (Senior Housing) Developers Agreement <br />F • (I'or adoption) Rc/oning and PUD No. 2 Ordinance <br />G - (For approval) Development Agreement (Senior Housing lemis & Conditions) <br />F.xhibits I'oUhcoming: <br />II - (For udoption)Resolution Approving Issuance of Senior Housing Revenue Bonds und^ <br />Authorizing Execution of Bond Documents and Development Agreetncnt <br />1 - (For approval) Bond Documents (Will be distributed or summarized by Steve RosEoIlal <br />Council meeting) <br />On OctoK'r 8 Council reviewed the final plans for this project including llotir plans and elevation <br />views, landscaping plan, grading'road'drainage and utility plans, and the signage plan. Wally Cicso <br />of DSII luLs rev iewed the landscaping plan, and his comments are expected K’fore Monday’s <br />meeting, and vv ill be incorporated into the approval documents. C'ouncil also rev ievved the deferred <br />fees situation and concluded that the deferrals would be recouped through the la.st 5 years of I IF <br />proceeds rather than being an obligation of the developer at the end of‘>9 v ears. <br />As of the October 8 Council meeting we hod anticipated approvals by the MC'WI) and Met Council <br />would be forthcoming within a few days after the October 22 meeting, and Council acknowledged <br />that final approval co tid be granted contingent on those approvals being received. Met Council is <br />still on track for approving our Comp Plan at their October 24 meeting, on their Consent Agenda. <br />Their drafi staff report appears to hold no surprises that I can discern. MCWD approval has, <br />however, been rescheduled for November 8. The infonnation we have received to dale suggests <br />MCW'D doesn’t have any issues which would cause any site plan or platting revisions. Also, the <br />minor concerns raised by MnT)OTiippear to be resolved, and Dunbar expects a letter from MnDOT <br />confirming tin., will be in our hand shortly. Staffrccommctuis thatCoundl's apjnovalonthc 22m! <br />he conJitioncit on staff canfinnatinn that all approvals arc completed before the plot and <br />development documents will he released for fding (as well as Clerk eertificatu.n and puhlication of <br />the rezoninii ordinance)