My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:26:11 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:21:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
523
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GlTYof ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE QITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />This property is located in the RR-1A Zoning District, where 5 acres is the minimum <br />lot area. The property consists of approximately 4.8 acres allowing a 2,000 s.f. <br />oversized accessor)’ building and a total aggregate of 4,000 s.f. for all accessory <br />buildings on the propert)*. <br />3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 17,2000 and <br />recommended approval by a vole of 3 to 2. <br />The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />A.The property is located in the S acre “rtiral” area of the City along County <br />Road 6 and Orchard Park Road. There are two adjacent residential <br />properties. Neither of the buildings would be fully visible to adjacent <br />properties, and would not be visible to the propert)’ to the south based on the <br />mature trees between the lots. The house, across Orchard Park Road, is <br />blocked from view to much of the applicant s property by mature trees along <br />the road. <br />B.Relocating the garage to another portion of the property would not be <br />possible without replacing the septic system, which is depicted on the site <br />survey. The existing s>'stcm has been determined to be non-compliant due <br />to the 3’ separation to the water table, however it is not required to be <br />replaced until 2010. Additional testing has been completed to locate a future <br />primar)* and secondary’ site on the west side of the propert)’. <br />Staff has confirmed the location of the septic tanks and drainfield restrict the <br />property from allowing construction of a pole bom behind the house. South <br />of the drainfield, the property drops off and is v ery low , the water table and <br />drainage would be a concern. This would also require extensive regrading <br />and construction of a ver> hng driveway to the rear of the property. <br />The existing drive would provide access to the pole bam. This docs require <br />the removal of a two stall garage which has recently been renovated with a <br />ne’.v roof <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />irfAnJki
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.