My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:26:11 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:21:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
523
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, OCTOBER 8,2001 <br />& (H649/41 Dmmbar DevehpmeHt, /nc., 2060 W^yzaUi BotUevard^-FUtai nan <br />Review—Stmtm Update—Comtmutd <br />asked about ADA accessibility. Dunbar stated all units are accessible, with 5% of the <br />units completely handicapped usable. <br />Jaclyn Ricks, of 2108 Sugorwoods. asked if they could save any of the uces. Dtmbar <br />stated they wouldn ’t survive the construction shock and would all die within a year. <br />Flint asked about bathtubs in the units. Dunbar slated they will be step-over tubs with <br />hand-holds, except in the handicapped units, which would have n>ll-in showers. All two- <br />bedroom units w ill have a tub and a walk-in shower. <br />Gaffron summarized by stating that they had discussed the site plans, he would make sure <br />the TIF agreement included a statement giving City stall* priority at the housing complex, <br />on the issue of deferred fees the City would pay itself back during years 21 - 25 of the <br />TIF, and fmal approvals should happen on October 22. <br />Carl Berg come before the Council and stated he was interested in building a 10,000 - <br />12,000 s.f. medical/dental facility on the land due si>uth of the City ofTIces. I le asked if <br />Council had considered their proposed concept and if he should pursue a formal proposal <br />for the development. Moorse stated the Council was supportive of th.' concept, but the <br />development would need to set the tone for Kelley Parkway. <br />*9. Ml-2688 Kirt Woodhousc, 1780 Shorctinc Drive—Lot Line RcarninKcnient— <br />RL.S Approval—Rcsolutkm No. 4701 <br />White noved, and Samcvcrc seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4701 approv ing the <br />registered land survey of a lot line rearrangement located at 1780 Shoreline Drive. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br />White suggested the City needs some kind of historic preservation ordinance to help <br />preserve areas or prevent certain developments. <br />PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT <br />None.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.