My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:26:11 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:21:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
523
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, OCTOBER S, 2001 <br />6. Amendmeitt fo Animat RegulatioHs—Contimied <br />Sansevere stated the number of cats allowed on a property could be reviewed on a cose by <br />case basis. <br />Flint agreed that the number could be set for each case at the time of licensing. <br />^^Tiite asked who would review the kennels. Moorse staled the Community Ser\ icc <br />Officer inspects kennels yearly. They would have to review the kennel requirements to <br />address cat specific problems. Gaffron stated they would need a clear set of rca.sonablc <br />criteria to include in the ordinance. <br />White amended hb motion, and Mayor Peterson seconded, to require a kennel <br />license for over 4 cats w ith no set limit on the number of cab that w ould be allow ed. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Mayor Peterson staled the Council had conceptually approved the ordinance and the final <br />ordinance would appear before Council at the next meeting. Hollander and his neighK^rs <br />asked to receive a copy of the ordinance before the next meeting. <br />7. Mll-2702 Brcnshcll Homes, 3551 Livingston Avrnui <br />Resolution No. 4700 <br />-Renew al N'ariances— <br />Uuttenberg stated that the applicant was requesting a renewal variance to construct a new <br />house on a lot he had purchased. The previous house and shed were demolished. She also <br />stated the applicant had provided stafT with all information they had requested. <br />Steve Bchnke of Fine Line Design Group was present to represent the applicant. He <br />stated Brcnshcll Homes owned the lot, and he was the builder. The house would be <br />several hundred square feet less than what was allowed, so it would not max-out the site. <br />Mayor Peterson slated that the drainage issue wns of concern. <br />Karen Cuff, of 3572 Livingston Avenue, asked if she would be at risk of being fIiH>dcd <br />when the new house is built. She hud built a new drainage s\stem on her property, and <br />had spent $40,000 in the last 12 years because of drainage issues. She has to dig out soil <br />every 3-4 years because of the run-ofl'into her yard. She staled the hardcover on the lot <br />would be tripling with the new construction. <br />Kellogg stated that 6 ” of rain in a 24 hour period is considered the standard hundred year <br />event. They found that run-off from the new construction would occur in such small
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.