Laserfiche WebLink
5. <br />A. <br />B. <br />C. <br />D. <br />E. <br />The property .x been developed with a residential use since at least 1973. <br />The lot can be developed without the need for further variances. <br />The lot size is consistent with that of other developed properties in the <br />neighborhood. <br />The detached accessory- building is in good structural condition. <br />The detached accessory building was likely constructed under current 75* <br />setback rules without a permit with no similar structures in the immediate <br />neighborhood and is of no historical value. Is on a cement slab therefore <br />easily moved. <br />The detached accessory ’ building is currently located within 75* of the <br />lakeshore and be moved to a conforming location. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br />it and do not apply generally to other propert>- in this zoning district; that granting <br />the variances will not adversely aflect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicants, but is necessary’ to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br />or difficulty; is necessary’ to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; <br />and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by Cit> Staff, comments by <br />the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the conununity. <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS <br />Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants <br />Page 2 of? <br />ii