My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
10-08-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:23:01 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:21:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
----- <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />A«rut20,200l <br />3551 LivlDgstOD Aveout lo Ibe Sepltmb«r 17,2001 Plaoniog Commission roccling, dut to the <br />absence of the Applicant VOTE: A>es7,NavsO. <br />£W BUSINESS <br />(WK«0i-2«89 >L\M>EEP SODHl, 4050 DAHL RO.U). AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES AND <br />COND^ONAL USE PERMIT, 7:18 p.m. - 7:53 p.m. <br />Mandeep So^, Applicant was present. <br />The Certificate of Maiiing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Weinberger stated the City of Orono became aware in late spring of some vegetation remov al and <br />\replacement of a stairway ot^the lakeshore side of the property located at 1080 Dahl Road. The <br />property owner had purchased'^ property the previous >ear and hired a contractor to replace the <br />li^Usiistairway and retaining walls on the lui|side and to remove the vegetation. The vegetation removal <br />\ <br />occurred along the stairway leading to the lakeshore. Weinberger noted this work was done prior to the <br />City issuing a permit approving the work. Staf^ssued a slop work order and required the property- <br />owner to apply for the proper permits. <br />Orono’s Shoreland Ordinance does not permit "Intensive Vegetation Removal" w ithin 75 feet of the <br />shoreline, on steep slopes, or within the bluff impact zone. Weinberger indicated the area where the <br />vegetation removal occurred is a protected bluff area, with the sl^e.xceeding an average grade of 12 <br />over the length of it. Weinberger stated the area above the stairway consists mostly of an overgrown <br />\grassy area, which suffered some damage due to the equipment driving over |he area. A walkway also <br />e.\isted from the residence down to the prev ious stainvay. ^ <br />Suff, upon discovering removal of the vegetation, reviewed the site and found that a^rtion of theata^rti <br />,\stairway and retaining walls had been replaced. Sttffdid Issue a building permit to allovv the property <br />\ <br />owTter to complete the stairway and retaining wall replacement, with the condition the property owner <br />apply for an after-the-fact variance and conditional use permit to permit the retaining wall replacement <br />\ <br />PAGES
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.