My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
10-08-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:23:01 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:21:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CityofORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 1864__________ <br />3. Applicant is placed on notice that Orono Municipal Zoning <br />Code Section 10.03# Subdivision 6 (C) prohibits the sale or <br />transfer of any parcel or combination of adjacent parcels which <br />singly or in combination are non-conforming in area or width; or <br />which sale or transfer makes the retained property or properties <br />non-confoxrming; without Council approval. <br />4. Applicant is further placed on notice# that based on the <br />survey submitted with the application# the existing main house at <br />one point appears to be only 23* from the side lot line where a <br />30* side setback is required, hence sale of the guest house <br />parcel would cause the main house parcel to be non-conforming# in <br />violation of S10.03# Subdivision 6(C). A simple lot line re <br />arrangement would remedy this potential future problem. Also#* <br />the survey indicates that the lot lines could be arranged so that <br />while maintaining a 30* setback to the existing house# the lot <br />width of the guest house parcel could be increased to approxi <br />mately 195*# nearly meeting the required lot width but still <br />requiring a slight variance. <br />5. Applicant is further placed on notice that if the guest house <br />parcel was sold off separately# that an access easement would be <br />required over the existing driveway on the main house property. <br />6. The applicant is advised to check on the relative property <br />tax benefits of combining or not combining the 9 properties held <br />in common. <br />7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and <br />conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the <br />Zoning Code# shall automatically terminate any authority granted <br />herein# and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. <br />8. The undersigned applicant has read# understood and hereby <br />agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself# <br />hxs heirs# successors and assigns# hereby agrees to the recording <br />of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.