My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
10-08-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:23:01 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:21:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITYof ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 8 9 5 2_____ <br />B. The adjacent propenies on either side of applicant's propert>* are <br />developed uith existing single family residences, hence no additional land <br />is available to make the lot larger. <br />C. Development of this lot would be in character with the neighborhood, as <br />evidenced by the fact that of 73 homes in the neighborhood bounded by <br />Shad>-wood Road on tl« east and Blaine Avenue on Lhc west, including <br />Livingston Avenue. L>Tic Avenue and Crjstal Place, 41 are on single 50' <br />lots, 23 are on double 100* lots, and 9 are on triple ISO' or larger lots. <br />D. Even though this lot is significantly smaller than the zoning district <br />standards, a residence can be built on the property which meets the lot <br />coverage, setback and hardcover standards of the LR-IC district <br />E. Allowing the replacement of the existing deteriorated structure with a <br />modest residence will help the City meet its goal of maintaining <br />affordable housing in the Ciw. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safew and <br />welfare of the communiw. <br />The Cit>' Council finds that the conditions existing on this propert}' are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variances woald 4iot adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficult}'; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.