Laserfiche WebLink
Hardship Explanation for property at 700 Tonkawa Rd. Orono, MN <br />Owners: Ted and Jody Spooner <br />This property has an approximate 20% to 30% continuously sloping <br />grade from the street until the steeper pitch 75 feel to the lake. Water runoff <br />during rainstorms goes down the property grade to the lake with erosion <br />supposedly slowed by retaining walls. The runoff problem is accentuated as <br />the adjacent house to the north, when remodeled, was built on a higher land <br />grade causing their roof and land water runoff to drain directly onto our <br />lower property. <br />The steeper land pitch to the lake originally had multilevel creosote <br />railroad tie retaining walls with concrete and railroad tie stairs. Over the <br />years, the retaining walls had caved, rotted, and fallen apart. Soil washed <br />over and through the walls. During significant rainstorms, water running <br />down the property grade caused washout of dirt, debris, and creosote (an <br />environmental poison) through the dilapidated railroad tie retaining walls to <br />the lakeshore. The steps had become pitched toward the lake and dangerous, <br />resulting in numerous falls of both children and adults. The initial steeper <br />pitch beginning at 75 feet from the lakeshore presently has no stairs and is <br />difficult to negotiate safely. This is a problem for older people who are <br />walking down to the lake. We have been concerned about personal injury. <br />For environmental and safety reasons, we took steps to correct the <br />problems with the original stairway and retaining walls. The creosote <br />railroad ties were completely removed and disposed of as hazardous waste. <br />The retaining walls were rebuilt with permanent boulder walls with silt <br />barriers and a stone stairway. Neither our landscape contractor nor we were <br />aware that a variance was required to remove and rebuild an existing <br />retaining wall. When we learned this, construction was stopped and the <br />upper stairway was not completed. For safety reasons, we would like to <br />finish the extended stairway on the initial steeper pitch. This is shown on <br />the survey as “proposed steps”. <br />The previously existing hardcover from 0-75 feet prior to rebuilding <br />the wall was 350 sf After rebuilding the walls and stairway (without <br />additional “proposed steps”) the hardcover is 490 sf. If the “proposed steps” <br />are accepted, the final proposed hardcover from 0-75 feet would be 538 sf. <br />^; <br />i(f