09-24-2001 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING _____ October 23,2000 _____ •(#11) #2620 PAUL PUSCUZ21,3320 NAVARRE LANX - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4548 Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUT^ON^O. 4548, a Resolution approvins a variance to allow placement of an acce^sofy structure between the principal building and the front lot line where no ucetssofy'i(ructurcs are normally allowed and 15 feet from the front lot line where 30/eefis required for the property located at 3320 Navarre Lane. VOTE; Ayes 3, Nays' •(#12) #2621 JAMES BARTI RESOLUTION NO. 4545 flS TOGO ROAD - PRELIMINARY PLAT- Flint movedj^^ailsevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4549, a Resolutionifpproving preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined in the Resolution. VpItT Ayes 3, Nays 0. •(#13) #2624 ROGER OLSEN, 815 PARTENW'OOD ROAD - RENEWAL VARI.ANCES RESOLUTION NO. 4550 Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4550, a Resolution granting renewal of variances to allow the remodeling and expansion of the existing residence to include a four stall garage and additional living space for property located at 815 Partenwood Road, subject to the conditions outlined in the resolution. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#l>Ai;^L^LAR THORKELSON, 440 BIG ISLAND, AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE Mrs. Willmar Thfl^lson and John Waldron, Attomey-at-Law, were present. Bottenberg stated the Apphe^ts have requested an afler-the-fact variance to permit a 12’ by 24* storage shed to remiin^ this property located on Big Island. The shed is currently located 23 feet from a platted, dedicated right-of-way where 30 feet is required. The Planning Commission voted 3 to 3 on a motion to recommend denial of the variance to permit the storage shed to remain on the property!'^ the opinion of the Plartning Commission members favoring denial that permitting the storage sMdiqremain would set a negative precedent The Planning Commission members would not have voted fohtl\e plan as is, but would favor the sixe of the shed be decreased or moved to meet the required setbaclcv. It was the opinion of the Planning Commission members favoring variance'^pproval that permitting the storage shed to remain was acceptable because only a small portion of the storag^hed was in the setback. The platted, dedicated right-of-way is not and is not intended to be dev^pe^treet within Big Island and because the building is in the most appropriate location on the lot because of the topography. PAGE?