Laserfiche WebLink
Ihc property in question, so neighboring view-s should not change with the pool addition <br />Setbacks <br />The proposed pool is located more than 75* from the OIIWL and meets the required setbacks <br />from the side lot lines. OIIWL and structure. <br />Hardcover: 75'-250' <br />pie proposed pool is located in the 75*-250* hardcover zone \hcrc 10.757 s.f (25*!i) hardcover <br />is permitted. In addition to the pool, the proposal shows decking and retaining w alls, nil of which <br />w imiuded in the hardcover calculations. As proposed, there is 10,749 s f (24 98V.) hardcoser <br />in this setback zone, just under the maximum permitted. No hardcom variance is necessary. <br />Structural Coverage <br />The pool is not considered part of the structural coverage on the lot since there are no portions of <br />it greater than 6 ’ in height. <br />Iltetory: <br />In 1988. a conditional use permit for a permanent dock was granted (zoning file «1285; <br />resolution #2446). 1 here have been no other land use applications on this property? <br />TTic deck on the lakeside of the home was constructed in 2002. The house has been in existence <br />since before the current zoning ordinance was adopted. <br />Hardship: <br />The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Uxhibtt A. Ihc applicants should also <br />be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. <br />Issues for Consideration: <br />1 . The existing house was constructed before the zoning ordinance was adopted and docs <br />nut encroach into the average lakeshore setback: <br />2. Although hardcover in the 75’ to 250’ setback zone increases with this proposal, it docs <br />not c.xceed the maximum permitted in the zone; <br />3. Structural coverage docs not increase with this proposal; <br />4. The proposed pool meets all of the required setback criteria; <br />5. The existing vegetation on the property screens the pool from the neighboring homes; <br />6. Ihe neighboring homes will not be negatively affected by the construction of the pool due <br />to their orientation on the properties; and <br />7. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />Staff recommends approval of a variance to permit construction of an in-ground pool that <br />encroaches 32’ into the average lakeshore setback. <br />rOJ-2891 Eric and Karen Paulson <br />5'I3'2003 <br />Page 2 of 2