Laserfiche WebLink
M3-2OT2 INI WlilMrsI Tran <br />Mayl4,2NJ <br />P«|f2 <br />The property was for sale over the winter and staff received many calls regarding the possibility of <br />this property acquiring access to the lake via the lagoon that juts in from Forest Lake. Howc\ cr. the <br />Ugoon docs not abut the property and the adjacent lot does not have sufficient shoreline to aivc uo <br />any frontage. • ^ <br />applicant has provided a site plan/survey indicating the proposed house location and the 25(T <br />Ukea^aetba^lineforhaidcovcrcakulationpurposes. The proposed house is located about 140* <br />from the shoreline, and moat of the site is within the 73-23(y zone, with the driveway and southerly <br />50-10(y of the lot in the 2S0-S0(r zone. Hardcover in the 75-25(y zone is proposed at 17%. and in <br />the2S0-S00'zoneis 16.8%, hence hardcover is not an issue. Hardcover may actually decrease from <br />Uttt proposed if the dclached gnge nd essocialed drivewsy arc not constructed; sidewalks and <br />other amemUea will have to be added to the final plans to allow hardcover ■-nnn......;nn before a <br />building permit will be issued. <br />All proposed setbacks are conforming, aiul average lakesbore setback is not an issue became ihj$ is <br />not a lakesbore loL <br />IssnM for Consideration <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />The lot appean to be similar in size to other developed lots in the neighborhood. <br />A single family residence previously existed on the property. The properly is seu cred. <br />Lot coverage by structures is approximately 3100 s.f or 8.3%, well within the 15% limiL <br />The site plan submitted docs not reflect that the existing detached garage has been removed. <br />^ **l''''^*y****** suff believes do not reflect the final proposal. For the record it <br />IS noted that the rernoved detached garage would have to be located in a conforming location <br />If actually proposed; md that the driveway encroachment into the neighboring property to <br />^ eliminated u part of the construction process (must be at least 5* from lot <br />The applicant has not provided a grading and drainage plan; such a plan will be required for <br />review and approval rmor to building permit issuance. There are no apparent ^ing and <br />drainage concenu with this property. -ri' ® <br />Staff Rccommcndatkw