11-17-2003 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mcmouwdim Date: November 14.2003 To: Planning Commission From: Janice \\ aataja. Cily Planner]!^ RE: Project 03-2958, Judd Dayton, Rencual Variance Request Stall has completed a preliminaiy review of the existing accessory structures on the Da>ion property to examine whether or not the bam located at 2885 Little Orchard \\ ay can be added to the estate at 825 Old Cr\stal Day Road. Mr. Dayion ha.s requested additional time so that his altome>s can examine options which would allow the bam to remain. Staff has allowed the lime extension and the request will be heard at the January Planning Commission meeting. Staffs preliminary findings are as follows: 1. Allow ing the bam to remain in it's current state would require a CUP to allow an oxersized accessory structure, a variance to the accessory structures section of the ordinance which states only one oversized acces.sory building per parcel (one already exists), and a variance to allow greater than 6.000 square feel of total accessory structures one property (see attached ordinance). These planning actions arc required whether 2885 Little Orchard Way is combined with 825 Old Cry stal Bay Road or the bam is merely moved to 825 Old Cry sul Bay Road. 2. Requiring the bam to be reduced to under 1.000 square feet would eliminate the need for the oversized accessory building CUP and associated variance but sull may require a variance to allow greater than 6.000 square feel of total accessory structures on one property. 3. Requiring the bam to be rcdaced to 832 square feet or less would eliminate the need for any of the above mentioned planning actions Staff, at this point, feels option <»3 is the most appropriate due to the nature under which the original v ariance was granted. The applicant has stated he doesn't intend to build a house at 2885 Little Orchard Way and therefore. es.scntially. makes the original variance approval null and void in stafl's view. Stall has informed the neighbor which appeared at the Planning Commission meeting that the application has been delay ed until January. Mr. Hoyl wanted the attached comments to go on record. Fnclosures: Section 78-1434 Neighbor ’s Comments cc. Mike Gaffron. Planning Director