My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
11-17-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:41:41 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:39:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
396
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. Hardships and Unique or Mitigating Conditions <br />]. Lot and Area <br />The Newkirks propose to use their present lot, the lot they have occupied since 1999, and <br />has been the site of the present house since 1964. for theL- new home. This homesite, containing <br />two planed lots, cannot be expanded to the west due to the Hwy 15 right of wnv or to the east <br />into the Lake. Table B describes the adjacent lots between the f anager Lake Bridge and Brackens <br />Point <br />TABLE B ADJACENT LOTS AND LR-IA LOT STA.NDARDS <br />.Area / sq ft Width <br />Required 87,120 200 ft <br />1475 Shoreline 46.529 <br />1487 Shoreline 28.317 125 ft <br />1489 Shoreline 52.329 132 ft <br />1491 Shoreline 48.170 190 ft <br />1200 Brackets Pt 40,293 <br />195.638 <br />4.5 ac SouSource, Henn.-pin Countv- <br />Combining the Newkirk s non conforming present parcel with just the parcel to the north, <br />1487 Shoreline Dr. (also non conforming), or just the parcel to the south, 1491 Shoreline Dr. (also <br />non conforming). wx>uld provide the required lot width but would not provide enough additional <br />lot area to create a conforming lot. To create a conforming lot the Newkirks would have to acquire <br />both 1487 and 1491 Shoreline Dr., demolish the homes cn those lots, and combine the lots into a <br />single new parcel. It would be a practical if not iir.possfnle hardship to require the Newkirks to <br />create a conforming LR-I A lot for their home. <br />The result of gn-.-ang the variance wo-ald be to simplv rccog.nize the existing a.-. J compatible <br />condition. The continued use of the lot for a newly con«*..'’acted single family home would not <br />introduce or create a.ny new impacts or conflicts a: the site nor alter the essential character of the <br />area. The 15V, lot coverage standard is met by the proposed home on the present lot, and the <br />existing relationship of the homes w ould be mainlined. .Absent the requested variances to permit <br />rebuilding the home, the 0 to 75 ft coverage will not no: be reduced by 519 sf and 100%, and the <br />75 to 250 ft lot coverage will not be reduced b>* 2019 sf. and 22 %. <br />2. Side Yards <br />On a lot assumed by the Code and the regulations for the district to be of over 2 acres in area <br />and having a minimum width of200, the LR-1A requirement of a total of 60 ft of side yard, 30% <br />of the lot. is compatible and reasonable. If the lot is in a.n a.'ca of mo acre lots, each at least 200 ft <br />wide, this requircmcr.; is probably essential to the nal-*.2ining the character of that district <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.