Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />L <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monda>. September 15,2003 <br />6;00 o'clock p.m. <br />(#13 #0: WJM PROPERTIES. LLC, Crattaved) <br />construct the berms once they have uorked out their problems with the especially <br />since the Planning Commission had gene to great lengths to screen the site in the original <br />applicatioN. <br />Rahn agreed, stating that screening a critical piece of the proposal. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Hawn Mosed, Mabastli sccoMicd, lo recommend Approval of Application #03-2948, <br />WJM Properties, LLC, 2005 West ayzala Boulevard, graating a ConditioBal Lise <br />Permit Eileasioa of the Umeframe for appUcaat lo meet the coadilioas of approval of <br />ResolulkHi No. 4845 lo December 31.2004; aud rccomoieads approval of an <br />ameudmeat of the eiistiag CUP lo allow for lalerim use of feaclag la lieu of berms <br />and vegetalioo aloag the aortb aad northeast tides of the parking lot, per appMcaats <br />staled ameadoMBl language subjecl to Ihe conditioa Ibal the berm and plaaliags shall <br />be required al such time that the appUcanU* issues with Ihe .MCWD are rcsohed. <br />VOTE: Ayes 7, NaytO. <br />PLANNING COM.MISSION CO.MMENTS <br />(#14) REPORT OF PLANNI.NG COM3IISSION REPRESENTATIVES <br />ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETI.NGS OF AUGUST 25, AND SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 <br />GolTron reported that, during the August 25-*' Council meeting. John Jones, of North Shore <br />Drive, spoke during public comments u ith regard to his application and the lack of a half <br />story ordinance. City Council directed suilT to work w ith Mr. Jones to come lo a reasonable <br />conclusion on his application; how ever. Gaffron stated that they have been unable to w ork <br />out agreeable terms to date. <br />Zugschw ert indicated that the only item on the Council agenda for September 8*^ w as the <br />Thompson application request for oversize accessory space, which the Council denied by <br />unanimously supporting the Planning Commission recommendation. <br />(#15) OTHER ISSUF.S FOR DISCUSSION <br />Gaffron reported that, as of last Saturda>. the new Code was codified and adopted. <br />Rahn suggested that, in the future, when the Commission discusses an item on the agenda <br />and feels the need to ‘tweak* the language in the code, if this could be done in a Planning <br />Commission rather than holding an additional work session on the item. <br />P.\GE 24 of 25 <br />1