10-20-2003 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CX)MMlSSION MEETING Monday, Sqxember IS, 2003 6:00 o'clock p.m. (»9 #03-2942 GEORGE AND MARILYN MILEISNIC, CMttoMd) Mabusth questioned whether a tree planted on the hillside might, in fact, cause additional erosion control problems. >MuIe he was intent on establishing a root structure on the hillside. Smith indicated that sumacs or trees inhibit undergrowth by shadowing the undergrowth from taking root. Fritzler stated that he belie\*ed they had presented the best option for what they face. Chair Smith asked for more than one tree. ■mwr aovcd, Hawn seconded, lo rccoMnend Approval of Applicallon #03-2942, 3243 Casco Circle, Jin Snllli of Concept Landscaping on behalf of George and MnrRyn Mllensnic, granting a Conditional Use Pemit lo repair a landslide, constmetion of a 4* retaining waflsilnaled 6* to 12* Don the OHWL, within the 0-7S* setback tone, and maintenance of a slope no greater than 2:1, subject to a mlaimnn of one maple tree planted lakeward of the rctaiaiag walk VOTE: Am 7, Nays 0. Ms. Mileusnic complimented Foth for her assistance and w illingness to work with them. (Rcccas was lahea from 0:36-0:41 P.M.) (#10) #03-2943 ROBERT AND JANET LABALT, 3202 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, VARIANCE, 0:41 - 9:00 P.3I. Robert and Janet Labalt. the Applicants, w ere present. Waataja reported that the applicanu request the following variance to construct an addition, approximately SIS s.f., to the existing home. 1 . Hardcover variance for the 7S-250* zone to allow 37.6®/o hardcover when 25% is normally allowed and S0.S% currently exists. 2. Hardcover variance for the 2SO-500' zone to allow 42.7% hordcovet when 30*/'o is normally allowed and 55% currently exists. 3. Side yard setback variance to allow a setback of 2.8 feet when 10* is required and 2.8* currently exists. 4. Strucmral coverage variance to allow 19.4% when IS*/o is required Waauja explained that the applicants are proposing to buil«: addition to the existing home over existing driveway hardcover and to add a two-si*»> adjoining the proposed addition to the existing home. The applicant is pr - .m additional 1 S square feet ofhardcover for the living addition and an additional 81 s,(uare feet for the deck with significant driveway removals. The nature of this lot requires a shared driveway for the lakeshore lot to the north. Currently, the applicant is not using the shared driveway and is PAGE 16 of 25