My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-20-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
10-20-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:40:54 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:39:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
267
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
286S Link Orchard Way <br />Orooo, Mianesott SS39I <br />EXHIBIT F <br />Stevlnj B. Hont <br />October to. 2003 <br />Phone: 612.803.2988 <br />Fa*: 952.249.0962 <br />Email: shoyt9rciTplus.com <br />CityofOrono <br />Ann: Janice Waataja, City Planner <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />Dear Planning Commission Members; <br />We live at 2865 Little Orchard Way. and wish to advise you that u e oppose the Vanance requested <br />by Mr. and Mrs. Judson Dayton for Lot 3. Block 1. Little Orchard. Our reasons arc as follows: <br />1. The Variance was actually granted to the Developer of the seven (7) lots on the former <br />Carpenter estate. The Devclopere* suted intention was to tcmroranlv move the “bam** to the <br />rear of the site w hile he marketed the property . <br />Mr. Anderson did market a pr<>p>>sed home on Loi 2 or 3 which contemplated making the <br />“bam** an integral part of a large* »*t.;.ie <br />Neither the Developer nor the City ever contemplated that the bam would remain <br />permanently on the site in its present form as a nomrestdential stracture <br />2. The Petitioners have no intention of using the bam for a residential dwelling In fact, they <br />have no intention of improving the Property at all. They purchased the property simply to <br />Elfivgfli development of a home on Lot 3. w hich is adjacent to their 30 acre estate. <br />3. The bam is an eyesore which negatively impacts the aesthetic beauty of a special <br />neighborhood. The owners of homes on Linle Orchard Way do nut appreciate this <br />dilapidated, neglected fire hazard on the block <br />4. The original Vanance was granted to Mr. Anderson, the Dev eloper He sold the property to <br />another party, who in turn sold to the Dayions The first tw o 121 ow ner» of the lot did intend <br />to build a new home on the property. The Dayions do not, and are using the Vanance to <br />subvert the onginal intent of the City and the original development <br />If, by some chance, this Vanance is granted, the Petitioners should be required at a minimum to <br />renovate and restore the bam. and fully screen the bam from the street w nh landscaping 1 am <br />enclosing photographs w hich illustrate the condition of the bam. <br />Respectfully submitted.i\npceiruiiy surminco. < <br />Steven and Michelle Hoyt <br />SBHmp
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.