10-20-2003 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r U EXHIBIT E ORONO PLANNING C0M>nSS10N MEETLNG MINUTES FORMAT 17.1999 •2493 KATHERINE TAYLOR HOMES. CONTINUED Hugh eommtnttd that aha has raducad lha siza of lha drtvaway. Hugh axpressad fivstralton that lha haidoovar nmlt promotas outside storage of vehicles and other Rems. Lindquist stated that unfortunately hardcover needs to te DmRcd somehow. Lindquist commented that a hardship needs to be imposed by the land, noting that a steep slope does exist. Hugh Inqtdred whether she would be permitted to add 15S square feet of hardcover. Stoddard stated she would be allowed to add 156 square feet in stnjctural coverage. Hugh Inquired whether wood chips were okay. Hawn stated that wood chips are fine but that rock and plastic ur.derlaymenl are considered hardcover. There were no public comments. Lindquist stated he would be In favor of the deck but not the garage. Hawn moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of the portion of Application i2493. 692 Tonkawa Road, to permit the construction of a deck above the attached garage over the existing hardcover, with an attached spiral staircase, and to grant a variance to the hardcover in the 75-2S6* lakeshore setback. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Hawn moved, Berg seconded, to recommend denial of the portion of Application #2493, 692 Tonkawa Road, to permit the construction of a two stall detached garage 30 feet from the right-of-way and 10 feet from the side lot line due to the siructural coverage being in excess of 18 percent VOTE: Ayes 4. Nays 0. (#10) #2494 DAN ANDERSEN, 2665 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY - VARIANCES, 6:46 pja - 6:69 p.m. The Certifleate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Dan Andersen was present Lee Statman was present Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a variance for an ur.devatoped lot within the recently approved Litile Orchard Addition. When the subdivision was approved, a stable remained on the lot tocaled near the front yard setback line end encroaching into L*:e required 30 foot side yard setback. It was the subdividar'a intent that the building be removed; however, the Applicant has raquastad the stable be moved to a conforming location on the l:L The building would be relocated to the rear of the lot matting alt required yard setbacks. Weinberger stated a restrictive covenant would need to be placed over the lot for an oversized accessory building because K exceeds 1.000 square feet. The Applicant is also requesting that the City allow the west propc.ly line to be idenlined as a side Page 13 •**.