10-20-2003 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r FILCM3-2M2 aabvlO.2003 Hardship SlaleMcat Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit A, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Hardship AaaKiis tm comUdtrimi appUcmlotu for rorioHct, tte Ptmmmlmt Commbshm tkttt comUer tk* offtet tfkke •r^comdkhm,lltlHomdolt.domtet^Jlro,rhkiotko,mkikt^.omdtkeoffectoHr0km^ prtptr^knktsmrrommdlotorom. Tko HmmmMrg CnmUiitm tkoBeomUer rtcommunmg ^froroi for mrtooctt from iko tkerotprovbioms of iko Zomkrt Codt ki kutamcn ttkrre kotr strict 00WMWM »omM coou mmdoe kordtkip becotue ofcircmmstonces moiqmt to tkt ktdiridMol property onitr comidcraxion, mod skaU recommend apprpvai omfy wkm it is demomitroted tkot smek •ctlemtrttike In keeping wkktke spirit OHjkuent of tke Orono ZomtHg Code, Staff w-ould m^e the following recommendations in regards to the criteria for **undue hardship** pertinent to this application; I. "Tbe property in question canroi be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls.' Over of the property is located ahead of the tnerage lakeshore setback. In the opinion ofstaff this criterion is me:. 2. 'The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner.' In the opinion of staff this criterion is met. 3. "The variance, if granted, will r.oi alter the essential character of the localit\*' The proposed changes will lessen the bulk ami mass of the home, thus will imiiroxr the character of the locality In the opinion of staff this criterion is met 4. "Economic considerations alocc shall not constiniie an undue hardship if reas^le use for the propeny exists under the terms of the Zomng Chapter." The applicant has not indicated economic consideration for this proiect In the opinion of staff this criterion is met. A or applicable A'or explicable 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporao use of a 1 S.J ------