Laserfiche WebLink
if: <br />1% <br />M <br />OltONO lECOLA* COUMCXL WEmilC HEU) ACCCST 13, 1990 <br />SOmNC rZLE IISES-PIEIPONT COffTZKOEO <br />CAllantR nctfd that Mafcuith'i ra?to states that t.-.'- 5^est <br />housa/stable structure would have to be removed if Lot !•; tt r.st <br />corsHned with Lot 15. He said. "In light of infcmtir-. we <br />received pertaining to another application this evening. : do not <br />believe we can require removal of tne structure.* <br />Barrett said. "The City could grant a perm* based on tne <br />existence of certain health and safety structures, such as aoress <br />to the septic system." <br />Callahan acreed that Barrett's ccm-cnts would held true for <br />new. He said.'-If in the future, the property owners wish to <br />subdivide and sell Lot 14. the structure we are disc.ssi-g t‘is <br />evening should be removed." <br />Bellows said. "If the property owners reg-est a subdivision <br />of the property, the guest house structure and septic need* • - - - - <br />be addressed under the subdivision regulatiens.’ <br />Bernnardson suggested t bling this ratter to all:. ti“v' far <br />staff to explore available options. <br />>*a/er Craren as^ed Mrs. rierpont if taoli-g this ~atter for <br />two weeiis would pose any problems. <br />Mrs. Pierpont replied. "There is a timing prohler. -..-e wish <br />to complete tne guest nouse so tnat we may reside in it wm.e we <br />remodel our house. I have a contractor ready to start on <br />Monday." <br />Bellows as<ed whet.ner staff has explored the cpticn cf <br />locating an additional sept..c site cn Lot 15. <br />Caffron stated that staff has not locked at that cption. Out <br />based on topography, would probably be difficult. <br />Mayor Grabeti asxed whether there are any other unrcscived <br />issues invclved witn this application. <br />Mabusth replied. "There are none. In fact staff -as <br />determined that footings do in fact exist under the stacle. <br />Prior to the Planning Commissicn meeting, staff had been advite.d <br />that the footings did not exist. Tne Planning Cc--is*icn <br />recommendation was based on that incorrect information.* <br />ayor Crabc< suggested that staff be allowed to atto-ot to <br />resolve the lot ccmoinaticn issue without tne need to br.ng tne <br />matter bac< to Council. He said. "If there is a satisiartcry <br />solution, you may proceed witn construction. However, snc.ld <br />difficulties arise, the matter will have to come back to Tcunril <br />ir two wee<s." <br />- 12 - <br />5P'-