Laserfiche WebLink
ft3-2fM <br />OcMkirlft,2M3 <br />fteii <br />Does PlaimingCoaimitsioo have any problem with the fact that the grage as proposed will <br />have only a 14 depth of puking area within the property? Would Planning Commission <br />allow extra hardcover to allow for a gar«ge that does not Ike the street? <br />6. Does Planning Commission have any other issues or concerns vrith L‘iis application? <br />Staff Rccoouncadalioo <br />Staff itoocninends as follows: <br />1. Approval of lot area and width variances. <br />Denial of side street setback variances, and require thu the house and portico be redesigned <br />to eliminate the proposed encroachments. <br />Approval of Ik degree of hardcover variance necessary to accommctfate a house (and its <br />essential amenities) that is conforming in terms of setbacks and lot co\ rage; i.c.. allow only <br />the amount of hardcover necessary to functionally accommodue the house, driveway, <br />necessary sidewalks, AC pad, arxl perhaps a limited front deck (because the tendency is that <br />one may eventually appear anyhow if not addressed now). An option is to address the deck <br />issue by formally directing that under the approved plan, no deck shall be allowed. <br />(Applicants have indicated they will be presenting a slightly rc\ised plan show ine sidew alk, <br />AC pad and deck for Monday’s meeting) <br />The resolution should include language regarding the fact that this property docs not abut the <br />lake and does not currently have the right to a dock, as a warning to f.nire buvers.