Laserfiche WebLink
M3-2934 <br />Ocicber It, 2003 <br />Pagt4 <br />Hardship SCaltiDeal <br />uTapX'atiOT*”' nalemcnl. and should also be asked for his lesiUnony regaiding <br />Hardship Analysis <br />wiMrr. tht Pltmnirng C0mmi»%i0m sUB etmiUtr the effect efthe prcpeteB <br />tkeheeM.MfetyMdwHftreefthe eommumity, aiuieg andemridpeieBirefflc ceedUioet, light <br />^'•^effiee.fi^tothep^^fe^.eedtheeffecteneeleesefp^^ <br />far teHeecesfrem the titeeel protiLet efthe <br />mmigee te the ^tidmel preperty mmder eemtUeretiem. mmd theB recee,mem4 eppreem! enlr whee It it <br />^emareteithettmeh ecHemt he !m heeplmg whh the ipteh emi Uuemt ef the Oreme Zemimg Cede. <br />^rtTncnUo recommendations in regards to the criteria for "undue hardship" <br />1.•The pro^rty in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed <br />by the official controls." <br />“"ioac » his property not crested by <br />“The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality " <br />I'"'""'*’><ouse nUtm,after ,he <br />Applicant has not suggested that economics are a factor. <br />“Undue hardship also iiKludes. but is not limited to. inadequate access to direct sunlight for <br />Sot applicable.