Laserfiche WebLink
Memoraadvin <br />To: <br />Froa: <br />Planning Commission <br />Janice Waataja. Planner <br />Date: September 15.2UU3 <br />RE; Project s03-294l.465 Tumham Rt>ad. Paul Cady.Conditional Use Pcmiil <br />The applicant (acting on bchalt'of the property ouneri originall) submitted plans <br />applying for a conditional use permit to construct a pool and a ham on a through lot At <br />that time, the plans submitted showed a ban that did not meet the 75’ setback <br />lequirement. The applicant indicated tliai he would redesign the bam to meet the setback <br />and submit plans at a later date, and that the current application was to only include the <br />pool. <br />Since that time the applicant has requested that the bom be included in the application. <br />Plans were submitted over the weekend and were not included in the Planning <br />Commission packet. The attached plans show the bam shitted back meeting a 75’ <br />setback to the side property line consistent Zoning Ordinance requirements The ham <br />also meets the 2.200 .squanr foot maximum >ing!e acces.si^ry building si/e limitative <br />Idle applicant is requesting that the bam K.' approved with the pool subject to the rex ised <br />plans. If it IS not approved with the pool a separate ciMiditional use permit must be <br />approved for the bam. Staff has reviewed the plans and hxs identified a few issues for <br />consideration listed below. However, the City Attorney has indicated that action <br />regarding the bam cannot be taken at tonight's meeting K'cause it was never legally <br />noticed. <br />Issticf for ConsidcratioB <br />1. The ham shows six stalls where the pioferty is limited to housing only 3 horses. Is <br />the Planning Commission concerned that more than 3 horses could be kept on the <br />property? <br />2. Two of the outer stalls do not meet the “5* setback. The Ordinance states that the bam <br />itself mu.st meet the 75* setback but diKwn ’t distinguish between connected outer stalls. <br />KccommcBdation <br />Posi-ponc action on the bam until the October 20"* Plarming Commission meeting so that <br />proper notice for the bam conditional use permit can be legally published