My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
08-18-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:41:31 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:38:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
331
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
mytm <br />j«M ii.2et3 <br />PiftJ <br />Hardship Stateaieat <br />Applicants have provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit A, and should be asked for their <br />additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Anal)sb <br />Im eomsUerlmt •ppliewtUms for rarlmmee, the Piuming CommbsUm »hmtl comUer the effect of the propneJi <br />MHemce upon the hemith, utfe^ and negate of the eomnumltx, exhting and anticipated traffic condMoni, light <br />and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safefy, and the effect on values of property In the surrounding area. The <br />Planning Commbston shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the <br />Zoning Code In Instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because ofeircum t tanees <br />unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when It is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be In keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />Staff \\t>uld make the following recommendations in regards to the criteria for "undue hardship" <br />pertinent to this application: <br />1.*‘The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed <br />by the ofTicial controls.” <br />The property as it exists is being put to a reasonable use. <br />“The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by <br />the landowner." <br />The plight of the landowner in regard to the average setback encroachments Is a result of <br />the locations of adjoining homes, which applicant cannot control. <br />In regards to the lot coverage excesses and setback for garage, these arc a direct result of <br />ouver's desire for more home and space. <br />“The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” <br />The garage addition extending forward of the home may be somewhat out of character with <br />the neughborhood: the deck and porch additions will not alter the character of ihe <br />neighborlKtod. <br />“Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for <br />the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." <br />Economics hose not been discussed by applicant as a factor. <br />“Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for <br />solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined <br />in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter." <br />Not applicable. <br />“The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use <br />that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's <br />land is located.” <br />Not applicable.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.