My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
08-18-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:41:31 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:38:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
331
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L <br />•02-2930 <br />Augutl 14 2C03 <br />PageSofe <br />"Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct <br />sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered <br />construction as define^! in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, Nvhen in <br />harmony with this Chapter." <br />m <br />"The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance <br />any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the /one where the <br />affected person’s 1^ is located."m <br />7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family <br />dwelling as a two-family dwelling." <br />S/A <br />"The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question arc peculiar to <br />such property or immediately adjoining property." <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is not met. <br />"The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in <br />which said land is located." <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is not met <br />"The granting of the application is ncccssar>' for the presen ation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant." <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is not met <br />II."The granting of the proposed variance w ill not in any way Impair health, safely, <br />comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is met. <br />"The granting of such variance will not merely ser\c as a convenience to the <br />applicant, but is necessar)- to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty." <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is not met <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that the cxi.sting non-conforming fence within <br />the 0-75’ zone be removed? <br />2. Docs the Planning Commission agree that the property should be restored to the <br />levels prcx iously approved in 1995? <br />3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />.i- <br />mm
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.