Laserfiche WebLink
•292t.I972Ska4rwMd <br />Aagiial 11,2M3 <br />Pigc4 <br />Hardship Statemcat <br />Applicim has provided a brief hardship suictncnl in Eshibil A. and should be asked for his <br />additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Aaalysis <br />tke fUm^ing C^mmiuhm ikmU c^mtUUr th* e/ffct ^tke proposed <br />**^1**^'/*“^? **^a^*7 txiitimg •H^antUlpateJtrtfflc conditicns, tight <br />^rtbent'to th ’**'^ recommendations in regards to the criteria for "undue hardship" <br />I. ‘The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed <br />by the oflicial controls.” <br />The property is Ifeing put to a r.jsunMc use us 1/ esuts tojjy. <br />jjHic pHght of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by <br />There are a number of circumstances unique to the properts \shich Mere not created by the <br />iandowner. such as lot size, existing house location, neighboring house locations, etc <br />3. <br />4. <br />The variance, if granted, will .wt alter the essential character of the locality ” <br />Certain \ariances. tfgranted, may add la the xisual density in the ncighborhiHul <br />“Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for <br />the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter.” <br />The applicant ha* not suggestca that economics are a hardship <br />Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for <br />solar energy s^tems. Vari^ccs shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined <br />in Minn^ta Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2. when in harmony with this Chapter.” <br />Qnnting of variances might have a negatixe impact on the adjoining property s access to <br />*|^e Bo^ ofi^p^ md Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use <br />(Sot Applicable) <br />j