My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
08-18-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:41:31 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:38:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
331
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Datt Application Rec«i«^: 6-ltmj <br />Date Application Considered ai Complete: 6-1S4U <br />60-Day Rctiew Period Eipires: S-17-03 e-2. <br />Chair Smith and Planning ('ummissloners <br />Ron Moorse, Ci»y Administrator <br />From: <br />0ale: <br />Sybject: <br />Mike GafTron, Planning Director <br />July 17,2003 <br />#03-2919 Kevin & Deborah Thompson, 90 Myitlewood Road - Variances <br />- Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />l<ot Aren: <br />RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential, 2-acrc min. <br />1.729 acres (75,299 s.i.) gross; approx. 1.55 acres (67,000 s.Q net dry <br />Apptlcc 'on Summary: Applicant requests s side street setback variance to construct a 996 <br />s.f. detached garage. A second variance is requested to allow the new* garage to be attached to <br />an existing 848 s.f. detached garage v:-» ? 1T x _(?)_’ greenhouse (dimension undetermined). <br />The variances include: <br />1. Side street setback of 23.1' where a 50* side street setback is required, <br />2. 0\ ersize accessory structure variance (no accessory building larger than 1000 s.f is <br />allowed on a lot of 0-1.99 acres in area). <br />(Note: Applicants had indicated they also want to add a pool requiring a side street setback <br />varii ncc, but have not provided the requested location/size detail for that pool, so the pool <br />request is not under consideration as part of this application) <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends: <br />r) Approval of the side street setback variance for the 996 s.f garage. <br />b) Denial of the -riance to create an oversize accessory structure. <br />c) Consider whether screening should be required. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Letter of Request/Hardship Statement <br />C - Survey/Site Plan <br />D - Proposed Plans & Elevations <br />E - Property Owners List <br />F - Plat .nap <br />G - Topography map <br />H - Photo <br />Pertinent Code Sections <br />1. 10.03 Subd. 9(C)(2) <br />•*2. Oversized Accessory Structures are regulated by the following table: <br />Masimum Allowed <br />Maximum Individual <br />Accessory Structure <br />_LotArea __ rootprint Area <br />0-1.99 acre <br />2.00-3.00 acre <br />3.'Jl-3.50 acre <br />etc. <br />1,000 s.f <br />1,200 s.f <br />1.400 $.f <br />etc. <br />Total of All Accessory <br />Structure Footprint Areas* <br />on a Property <br />2,000 s.f <br />2,400 s.f <br />2,800 s.f <br />etc. <br />* Excluding non-roofed tennis courts, pools, paddocks, arenas
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.