My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
04-21-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:38:54 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:36:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Application Received: 2/18/03 <br />Application Complete: 2/20/03 <br />60 Day Deadline: 4/21/03 <br />Extension: 670/03 <br />TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />FROM: Jennifer Chapul, City Planner <br />DATE: April 10.2003 <br />SUBJECT: #03-2876 Sevic L. tanning <br />3329 Cr>'stal Bay Road <br />Variances ~ Public Hearing <br />Zoning Dulrict: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (0.5 acre) <br />Lot Area: 3,741 s.f. (0.09 acres) <br />Application Suromao : <br />The applicant requests the foIlo\N ing variances for consuuciion of a new 1,200 s.f. residence on the <br />propeit>’: <br />1. lot area of 3,741 s.f. (0.09 acres) where 21,780 s.f (0.5 acres) is required; <br />2. a lot width of 50 ’ where 100 ’ is required; <br />3. setback of 48* from the OHWt of Lake Minnetonka where 75 ’ is required; <br />4. rear >-ard setback of 10 ’ where 30 ’ is required; <br />5. an encroachment of 16* into the average lakeshore setback; <br />6. 1,121 s.f. (40.82%) hardcover within the 0 to 75 ’ lakeshore setback zone where none is <br />permitted; and <br />7. 285 s.f. (28.64®/i) hardcover within the 75 ’ to 250 ’ lakeshore setback zone where 248.75 <br />s.f (25®/^e) is permitted. <br />This application was tabled at the 3/17/2003 Planning Commission meeting for the applicant to <br />provide elevations of the proposed home. At the n.ceting, concerns were voiced regarding the <br />proposed encroachment into the av erage lakeshore setback and how the height of the home might <br />affect the neighbor ’s lake views. The Planning Commission also found it difficult to determine if <br />additional hardcover may be necessarv- (for sidewalks, door landings, etc.) w ithout elcv ation v iew s of <br />the proposed home. New plans have now been provided for review. <br />Exhibits: <br />A Analysis worksheet of three alternatives <br />B Surv’cv’s depicting three alternatives <br />C Proposed building elevations and floor plans <br />D Staff Report and exhibits of 3/17/2003 <br />M03-2876 Sexie L Lanning <br />4'1 7/2003 <br />Page I e/5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.