Laserfiche WebLink
Staff would remind the Planning CbnunisMoo diat hardcover and lot coverage variances have <br />consistently been denied for reconstniction on sunilar sized (approximately acre) lots in the acre <br />and 1 acre zones over the past 4 years. The comparisor with the aae zone is a fiiir one since the <br />hardcover, setback and lot coverage standards are virtually identical with those of the 1-acrc zone <br />Recent lakeshore rebuilds (2002.2003) that compare with the current proposal include- <br />- Soojian at 4496 North Shore Drive (100* width, 0.55 acres, no HC or lot coverage vreiaocesgranted) <br />- Twid\iell at 1865 Concordia Street (102* width, 0.56 acres, granted 32.4% HC due to tree <br />hardship limiting home placement, no lot coverage variance) <br />- Lindberg at 3440 North Shore Drive (IOff width, 0.47 acres, met all HC and lot coverage <br />limits, no variances) <br />- Goldberg at 1160 Loma Linda Avenue (113* width, 0.68 acres, no HC or lot coverage <br />variances granted) <br />■ Cable at 3532 Ivy Place (lOff width, 0.522 acres, denied variatKes for HC exceeding 25%) <br />Staff recommends tabling the plication to allow the applicants to decrease hardcover in the 75’ <br />to 250 ’ setback zone to know more than 25% by redesigning the proposed home. For example, a <br />home set at the 30 ’ street setback with a 600 s.f. driveway and 100 s.f. of sidewalk could have a <br />footprim of 1,600 sX. <br />*03-2886 Dr. Dttmis ondDiam KUluxn <br />4/17/2003 <br />Page 6qf7 <br />1 <br />A .