Laserfiche WebLink
BMEi <br />Analysis <br />A bliifrin.l),i, conducted to detcnnine inhere is a blulTon the propcit)’. The following <br />cnteni wttc analyzed and all %vere found to be true: <br />1. Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area: Yes <br />2. The slope rises at least 25' above the OHUT: Yes <br />"* ““ff >0 • P0in< 25’ or more aboK the OHWL averages 30% or greater; Yes (92.6%) <br />4. The slope must drain toward the water body: Yes. <br />Blt^ Impact Zones <br />V ** Th' bluff impact zone isdefined as the land within 20 from the top of the bluff. Within this zone, no structures or <br />accessoiT teiltt.es (except stairwa>s. lutdings mtd lock boxes) arc permitted. The existing house <br />IS partially located within the bluff impact zone whereas the proposed house is <br />completely outside of the zone. Howiwer. existing retaining walls and stairs are proposed to <br />remain within the impact zone. <br />Gradir^ Hlihin BU/0Impact Zones <br />Since a ;»nion of the exisUng tome is located within the bluff impact zone, some grading and <br />filling will be requurf when it is demolished. Placement of fill or excavated material is not <br />permitted within blulT impact zones so a variance is ncccssar>-. <br />Setback from the Top of the Bluff <br />e’^'re ‘ "ome is located as <br />S u« bluff whereas the propped home is 42' from the top of the bluff. <br />Other Conments: <br />City Engineer <br />luve'^TOc^red* T® <•»'«•"® commenls <br />Bask? <br />A dock is proposed on the property. Seasonally installed docks are pertnined as an accessorv use <br />on residential lakeshore properties which contain a residence. Since there has been a seasonal <br />d«k at this propetly in the past, the dock will not require a City permit. The placement of docks <br />on fjike Minnetonka is governed by the Lake Minnetonka Consenation District. <br />e03-?S36Dr Dennis and Dune Kdlum <br />4/17/2003 <br />Pate 4 qf 7