Laserfiche WebLink
8. Other issues raised by the PUuiniog Commission. <br />Staff Rccommfdrtiao; <br />With the existing foundatioo be removed and e new one constructed to accommodate the one <br />story addition above it. it is an opportunity for the city to have the residence conform to the <br />required side yard setback of 10*. Staffhas reviewed the application and the hardship provided <br />and does not see a substantial hardship which would justify the side yard setback variance. <br />If the Planning Commission feels there are substantial hardships for the replacement construction <br />of the foundation to be 5* rather than 10* from the property line, then a recommendation of <br />approval would be appropriate. <br />**Due to the plan changes being submitted on Friday morning, on Monday staff will have <br />detailed hardcover and structure calculations that will show the difference in a S* side yard <br />setback versus a 10* side >ard setback. <br />»03-2SII Curtis/Kathlecti Midthun <br />2941 Casco Point R<Md <br />4/11/2003 <br />PV6oT6 <br />___