Laserfiche WebLink
: -• V- <br />--■■■■•■■f-i-" <br />‘‘•“'Khv' <br />.* t io;- <br />i ■•> ! <br />L'-- <br />. * ’ • / \ ^ <br />-■ > *.4 <br />• ■ ■ <br />• • //* <br />V i <br />• • . I <br />• • <br />** ■ *•'*•..■ <br />' <1 <br />‘V >N <br />.:•! <br />» <br />■ rf^! <br />^'-1------’ <br />Ciiy oi 0R0?>.'0 <br />»£S0LJTiO*. O* TH! C»tvCOJ\C»L <br />NO _:r v_____ <br />3) Thei cxio*ir.5 rcsiOcnc* sttUCiure i» lorr^^jd 2€' £ron t^• <br />chorelir.e wit.'*. « second strry deck lecated iC fron the <br />shcrelin.*. Existir? hardcsver cr. the j.rcj.er*.y in the 0-75* tore <br />IS 30.41 and it, the 75-25C’ scr.e is <br />C) The fr'->.cf- J 3‘uitlcnal structure ircludea ec-rletien of the <br />second story ove: the entire cxlsti-c house, -ith a 3-levcl <br />edditiun brtweor. the exlstlr.r hcuse and the ^ar^^e. |:lu» a now <br />second story deck at the nerthvait end of the houre. None of th- <br />cJiitic.-.s >ii: ha clcacr .a t.-.? 1; <br />deck.lake than tho ex.jtir.g heuse and <br />r) The applicrnfa eriqir.cl |.r-?;o8al rhowed a reduction in <br />hardcover in the C-T5* rene free 30.4? to 30.11, and fron 4«.C ’. <br />to 44.4% in the 75-250’ sene. The initial Planning Cornissicn. <br />review of that prorosa! resulted in direction fr:n the Flanninr <br />Cernlsiion to further seduce hardcover en the jroperty, her.ee <br />rpFlicant returned with a vrcjestl fer 30.C% in the C-75* cene <br />rnJ 38.-1 in the 7*-25?’ rone. The Planning Cc-n' sicn feun.'.’ <br />t. is eubstantial hardcover reJueticn to be a ncsitiv« aspect cf <br />this apylicaticn end recorctenfed approval. <br />”1 ^ this property has lakeshare en 2 slden. <br />with a relatively snail area in the 75-250* setback rone, th ; <br />preperty nas sa-e unique hardships in that it could not suppert <br />a^ additions without variances. <br />F) The proposed additions will create no sig:.ficant visual <br />encroachrtent of views enjoyed by neighboring preperty owners, r-1 <br />will not be Isually obtrusive within the landscape due tc <br />the topography within the Irrediatcly Adjacent areas. <br />City Co..nci: has considered this applicaticn including th-s <br />find.ncs ar.d rocc—.endations of the Planning Co-r.lsB‘.on, report? h- <br />C-ty staf., ccrr.ents by the applicant and the effect cf the prepos-i <br />verijnte on the herlt**. safety and welfcno cf the cc-.- nity. <br />5. The City Council finds that th- rr-^:ti?r- crintinn en. thl <br />property are peeuiisr tc it and do net apply generally tc etl.o- <br />.n thl-. toning district: that granting tne variance wculd no- <br />‘-rafflc condltic.-.s, light, air nor pere a flro barer : <br />J- "5i5 Ting prep‘TtyJ vculd ret .-erely serve a- <br />.'■*2.*? *•’ *• norcssary to alleviate a de-c-- <br /><*i--i4ultyt is njcessary tc preserv • a substanti.il <br />111': '** ^1** ®-rllc.trt: and would be in keeping with the <br />-ntert c. the len.ir.e Code and Co.-* rehenssve Plan cf the <br />Page 2 c.» 5 <br />. •*:V*: <br />' h ^ *r *p <br />: <br />i ?:.• <br />; <br />• *.■ <br />»v <br />t : • <br />. • I . / .i'.-; • ; v;.. 'V