My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
03-17-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:37:33 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:36:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Wendy Botlcnbcrg, City Planner <br />Chair Smith and Planning Commissioners. <br />From: Mike Gaffron, Planning Director <br />Dale: March II. 2003 <br />Svbjcct: Proposed Vacation of Alley Adjacent to 3753 Casco Avenue <br />Mr. Kail has requested that the 14* alley located between his property and the adjacent property at <br />3721 Casco Avenue be vacated. The apparent purpose of the vacation is to gain land as credit <br />toward the 15% lot coverage allowance, to allow construction of a larger residence <br />This alley was dedicated in the plat of Casco Heights in 1 91 1. The alley was dedicated for the public <br />use. and while it may have seen minimal public use in the past, certain aspects of its location suggest <br />potentially greater use in the fulure: <br />1 . The alley provides a 14* wide continuous straight corridor between Casco Avenue and Casco <br />Point Road. <br />2. It provides a potential pedestrian connection from the Casco Avenue / Caroline Avenue / <br />Ethel Avenue neighborhood to the City beach at Carman Asenue. <br />3. \\1iile a portion of the alley south of the Kail site may be wetland, the possibility for use of <br />the alley in the future via a walkw ay through the wetlands, or for cross-country skiing and <br />snowshoeing access to the Lake via the beach in the winter, should not be minimized. <br />4. The property adjacent to the alley directly behind the Kail site is City-owned undeveloped <br />land, used for stormwater drainage purpose.^. We cannot predict the value of this alley as a <br />corridor for future stormwater needs, but w e shouldn ’t eliminate any possibilities. Likew ise. <br />as City land, the area behind Kail may have potential park uses that are currently not on the <br />radar screen, and this alley provides potential access for such use. <br />5. Post utility use of the alley may be minimal. How ever, we cannot predict the need for future <br />utility use of the corridor, and because it connects tw o main residential streets, there are likely <br />possible future uses for public utilities (such as sew er & water, gas, telephone, electric, cable <br />TV, or other communications needs) that we cannot now envision. <br />The City Council in recent yvan* has expressed a strong awareness of the value of public access to <br />the lake. This corridor has potential to provide connectivity betw een an off-lake neighborhood and <br />the lake. In recent years the Council has expressed a general reluctance to vacate public rights-of- <br />way that are in use. especially in Orono ’s defined Urban Area (the Vt- acre and 1-acrc zones, <br />including Casco Point). V.’Uile this alley may have had minimal use in the past, it has significant <br />potential for future public use. I would refer >x>u to the attached excerpts from Orono ’s 2000-2020 <br />Community Management Plan, Pages 4A-32 & 4A-33 regarding preservation of lake access, which <br />has applicabilit). even though tiii;> alley does not directly abut the lake. <br />Vacation of this alley’ would in my opinion not be in the best interests of the City.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.