Laserfiche WebLink
r' <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Wednesday, February 19,2003 <br />6;30 o'clock p.m. <br />(#03-2869 DR. ROBERT CLMMT, Continued) <br />Dr. Gunmit’s represiolalixe reiterated that the road\^ay was not new construction, it has <br />deteriorated over lime and use and the applicant w ishes to continue using it. <br />In an cflort to keep the hill as natural as possible. Dr. Gumnit stated that he would need to <br />gel access to it with his maintenance equipment. <br />According to Berg, this use should not be on this island, she did not find adequate hardship <br />to allow this use on this part of the property. <br />Ralin staled that repainng the path would be acceptable, however, building a roadway <br />would not. He believed the area was not conducive to what was being proposed and the <br />Codes should act a.s the Commission's guide to that cuncTusior <br />Bremer agreed with Rahn. <br />Mahusth agreed that adequate land existed elsewhere to suppivn this activity. <br />Chair Smith suggested that applicant consider other locations for the horses and pen near <br />the house, while still using the island for nding. <br />Dr. Gumnit asked the Commission to table his application to see if he could come back <br />with an alternative plan <br />Chan Smith suggested that he use this time to visit the pc-ople whose letters were received <br />by the City in order to addrc\ss their concents as well. She thanked the applicant for being <br />forthnght and open to discussion <br />.Mahusth moved. Chair Smith seconded, to recommend that Application »03-2869, <br />Dr. Robert Gumnit, 1100 Old Crvsial Bay Road, be tabled in order to allow the <br />applicant further time to investigate alternatives. VOTE: Aves 6. Nays 0. <br />(«7) #03-2871 SAI.I.V AND DAN \VE.ATIIERI.Y, 1214 Wll.DlllRST TRAIL, <br />AFT ER-THE-FACT VARIANC E 10:04- 10:45 F..M. <br />Sally and Dan Weatherly, the .\pp icant.s. and Brian Novak. Architect, were present. <br />Bottenberg rc*portc*d that the applicants were requesting two aOer-the-fact variances for a <br />newly constructed single family residence. The first variance would be to allow the <br />foundation of the newly constructed residc-cc to be located 9 I '2' from the side property <br />line where 10' is required. The second variance would be allow the eaves to encroach into <br />the side yard setback. <br />PAGE 22 of 26